Variability in “spontaneous” maternal behavior is associated with anxiety-like behavior and affiliation in Naïve juvenile and adult female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Abstract
Juvenile female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are spontaneously maternal, while virgin adult females show significant variability in their response to first pup exposure, ranging from infanticidal to full maternal behavior. In the present study, we investigated whether differences in anxiety-like behavior and affiliation are associated with juvenile-adult and adult individual differences in the response to pups. Forty juvenile (19-20 days) and 42 adult (60-90 days) female prairie voles were exposed to pups for the first time and tested for maternal behavior, anxiety-like behavior (elevated plus maze, open field), and affiliation toward age-matched, same sex conspecifics. Juveniles displayed less anxiety-like behavior, were more affiliative to unfamiliar conspecifics, and interacted with pups more positively than adults. Adults that displayed maternal behavior spent less time immobile, made more crosses through the center of the open field arena, and were more affiliative than adults that attacked the pups. This suggests that lower locomotion or exploration in a novel environment and poor affiliative behavior are negatively associated with maternal responsiveness in female prairie voles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Infusion of interleukin-6 increases OTR expression in the brain of female rats.
“Furthermore, infusion of interleukin-6 increases OTR expression in the brain of female rats [97].”
From Oxytocin and the Neural Mechanisms Regulating Social Cognition and Affiliative Behavior (2009) · cites this paper as [97]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 64 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Olazábal, D. E., & Young, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olazábal, Daniel E.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 166-178
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- OpenAlex
- W2021518853
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- Microtus ochrogaster, maternal behavior, anxiety-like behavior, affiliation, individual differences, infanticide, locomotion, exploration, social behavior, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Maternal Behavior, Motor Activity, Predictive Value of Tests, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Maze Learning, Principal Component Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review