Cited by 58Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionStress Responses and Cortisol

Variability in “spontaneous” maternal behavior is associated with anxiety-like behavior and affiliation in Naïve juvenile and adult female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

Olazábal, Daniel E., Young, Larry J.·2005·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

Juvenile female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are spontaneously maternal, while virgin adult females show significant variability in their response to first pup exposure, ranging from infanticidal to full maternal behavior. In the present study, we investigated whether differences in anxiety-like behavior and affiliation are associated with juvenile-adult and adult individual differences in the response to pups. Forty juvenile (19-20 days) and 42 adult (60-90 days) female prairie voles were exposed to pups for the first time and tested for maternal behavior, anxiety-like behavior (elevated plus maze, open field), and affiliation toward age-matched, same sex conspecifics. Juveniles displayed less anxiety-like behavior, were more affiliative to unfamiliar conspecifics, and interacted with pups more positively than adults. Adults that displayed maternal behavior spent less time immobile, made more crosses through the center of the open field arena, and were more affiliative than adults that attacked the pups. This suggests that lower locomotion or exploration in a novel environment and poor affiliative behavior are negatively associated with maternal responsiveness in female prairie voles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.20077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 58

Authors
Olazábal, D. E., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Olazábal, Daniel E.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
166-178
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2021518853
Cited by
58
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, maternal behavior, anxiety-like behavior, affiliation, individual differences, infanticide, locomotion, exploration, social behavior, sex differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Maternal Behavior, Motor Activity, Predictive Value of Tests, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Maze Learning, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review