Parental division of labor, coordination, and the effects of family structure on parenting in monogamous prairie voles ( Microtus ochrogaster )
Open accessAbstract
Family relationships help shape species‐typical social and emotional development, but our understanding of how this shaping occurs is still relatively limited. Prairie voles are a socially monogamous and biparental species that is well situated to complement traditional animal models, such as rats and mice, in investigating the effects of family experience. In this series of studies, we aimed to test hypotheses relating to how prairie vole families function under undisturbed, standard laboratory conditions. In the first study, we compared the parental behavior of primiparous biparental (BP) and single‐mother (SM) prairie vole family units for 12 postnatal days and then tested for sex differences, behavioral coordination, and family structure effects. Under BP conditions, nest attendance was coordinated and shared equally by both sexes, while pup‐directed and partner‐directed licking and grooming (LG) were coordinated in a sex and social‐context‐dependent manner. Contrary to our expectations, SMs showed no evidence of strong parental compensation in response to the lack of the father, indicating a minimal effect of family structure on maternal behavior but a large effect on pup care. In the second study, we examined the effects of these BP and SM rearing conditions on family dynamics in the next generation and found that SM‐reared adult parents exhibited lower rates of pup‐directed LG in comparison to BP‐reared counterparts. Situated in the context of human family dynamics and psychology, these results suggest that the study in prairie voles may help improve our understanding of family systems and how perturbations to these systems can affect adults and offspring. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 53:118–131, 2011
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In prairie voles, mating partners form highly selective pair bonds, share a nest, coordinate care of offspring, and display high levels of affiliative behavior toward each other and their young.
“In this species, mating partners form highly selective pair bonds, share a nest, coordinate care of offspring, and display high levels of affiliative behavior toward each other and their young (Thomas and Birney 1979; Getz et al 1981; Ahern et al 2011).”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Ahern et al 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 113
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hartung TG Dewsbury DA 1979 Parental behavior in 6 species of muroid rodents Behavioral and Neural Biology 26 4 466 7305807
- Low BS 2007 Ecological and socio-cultural impacts on mating and marriage systems Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology 449 462 New York, NY Oxford University Press
- Authors
- Ahern, T. H., Hammock, E. A. D., & Young, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ahern, Todd H.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-13
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 118-131
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- PMC
- PMC3164816
- OpenAlex
- W2145248393
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P51OD011132)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K02MH064692, MH0732505, R01MH077776)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- Microtus ochrogaster, biparental care, family structure, social monogamy, nest attendance, sex differences in parenting, intergenerational effects, family dynamics, postnatal development
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cooperative Behavior, Arvicolinae, Female, Grooming, Male, Maternal Behavior, Paternal Behavior, Sex Characteristics, Parenting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review