Cited by 113Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Parental division of labor, coordination, and the effects of family structure on parenting in monogamous prairie voles ( Microtus ochrogaster )

Open access
Ahern, Todd H., Hammock, Elizabeth A.D., Young, Larry J.·2011·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

Family relationships help shape species‐typical social and emotional development, but our understanding of how this shaping occurs is still relatively limited. Prairie voles are a socially monogamous and biparental species that is well situated to complement traditional animal models, such as rats and mice, in investigating the effects of family experience. In this series of studies, we aimed to test hypotheses relating to how prairie vole families function under undisturbed, standard laboratory conditions. In the first study, we compared the parental behavior of primiparous biparental (BP) and single‐mother (SM) prairie vole family units for 12 postnatal days and then tested for sex differences, behavioral coordination, and family structure effects. Under BP conditions, nest attendance was coordinated and shared equally by both sexes, while pup‐directed and partner‐directed licking and grooming (LG) were coordinated in a sex and social‐context‐dependent manner. Contrary to our expectations, SMs showed no evidence of strong parental compensation in response to the lack of the father, indicating a minimal effect of family structure on maternal behavior but a large effect on pup care. In the second study, we examined the effects of these BP and SM rearing conditions on family dynamics in the next generation and found that SM‐reared adult parents exhibited lower rates of pup‐directed LG in comparison to BP‐reared counterparts. Situated in the context of human family dynamics and psychology, these results suggest that the study in prairie voles may help improve our understanding of family systems and how perturbations to these systems can affect adults and offspring. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 53:118–131, 2011

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.20498

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prairie voles, mating partners form highly selective pair bonds, share a nest, coordinate care of offspring, and display high levels of affiliative behavior toward each other and their young.

    “In this species, mating partners form highly selective pair bonds, share a nest, coordinate care of offspring, and display high levels of affiliative behavior toward each other and their young (Thomas and Birney 1979; Getz et al 1981; Ahern et al 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 113

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hartung TG Dewsbury DA 1979 Parental behavior in 6 species of muroid rodents Behavioral and Neural Biology 26 4 466 7305807
  2. Low BS 2007 Ecological and socio-cultural impacts on mating and marriage systems Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology 449 462 New York, NY Oxford University Press

Authors
Ahern, T. H., Hammock, E. A. D., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Ahern, Todd H.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-13
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
118-131
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2145248393
Cited by
113
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011132)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02MH064692, MH0732505, R01MH077776)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, biparental care, family structure, social monogamy, nest attendance, sex differences in parenting, intergenerational effects, family dynamics, postnatal development
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cooperative Behavior, Arvicolinae, Female, Grooming, Male, Maternal Behavior, Paternal Behavior, Sex Characteristics, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review