Early Adversity Affects Cerebellar Structure and Function—A Systematic Review of Human and Animal Studies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Recent research has highlighted cerebellar involvement in cognition and several psychiatric conditions such as mood and anxiety disorders and schizophrenia. Attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder have been linked to reduced cerebellar volume as well. Cerebellar alterations are frequently present after early adversity in humans and animals, but a systematic integration of results is lacking. To this end, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases using the keywords “early adversity OR early life stress” AND “cerebellum OR cerebellar.” A total of 45 publications met the inclusion criteria: 25 studies investigated human subjects and 20 reported results from animal models. Findings in healthy subjects show bilateral volume reduction and decreased functional connectivity within the cerebellum and between the cerebellum and frontal regions after adversity throughout life, especially when adversity was assessed with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. In clinical populations, adults demonstrate increased cerebellar volume and functional connectivity after adversity, whereas pediatric patients show reduced cerebellar volume. Animal findings reveal cerebellar alterations without necessarily co‐occurring pathological behavior, highlighting alterations in stress hormone receptor levels, cell density, and neuroinflammation markers. Cerebellar alterations after early adversity are robust findings across human and animal studies and occur independent of clinical symptoms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 163 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Mundorf, A., Merklein, S. A., Rice, L. C., Desmond, J. E., & Peterburs, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE)
- Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mundorf, Annakarina
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-10-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e22556-e22556
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- OpenAlex
- W4403209318
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (437661157)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- childhood adversity, early life stress, cerebellum, cerebellar volume, childhood trauma, neuroinflammation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, animal models of stress
- MeSH terms
- Adverse Childhood Experiences, Animals, Cerebellum, Child, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Models, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review