Cited by 139Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and Research

The shape of plasma glucose concentration curve during OGTT predicts future risk of type 2 diabetes

Open access
Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad A., Lyssenko, Valeriya, Tuomi, Tiinamaija, DeFronzo, Ralph A., Groop, Leif·2010·Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to assess the relationship between the shape of plasma glucose concentration during the OGTT and future risk for T2DM. Methods: 2445 non‐diabetic subjects from the Botnia study received an OGTT at baseline and after 7–8 years of follow‐up. Results: NGT and IFG subjects who returned their plasma glucose concentration following an ingested glucose load below FPG within 60 min had increased insulin sensitivity, greater insulin secretion and lower risk for future T2DM compared to NGT and IFG subjects whose post‐load plasma glucose concentration required 120 min or longer to return their plasma glucose level to FPG level. IGT subjects who had a lower plasma glucose concentration at 1‐h compared to 2‐h during OGTT had greater insulin sensitivity, better beta cell function and lower risk for future T2DM. Conclusions: These data suggest that the shape of glucose curve can be utilized to assess future risk for T2DM. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dmrr.1084

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in diabetes incidence between our study and Abdul-Ghani et al. could be explained by dietary recommendations or metformin.

    “This difference could be explained by the dietary recommendations or the recommendation for drug therapy with metformin among our patients.”

    From Spontaneous hypoglycemia: should we mind the gap? Long-term follow-up of healthy people who met Whipple’s triad criteria (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results report diabetes incidence in Abdul-Ghani et al.’s cohort, and the Discussion recommends considering lifestyle change and pharmacological therapy to reduce future risk. The paper does not establish that dietary recommendations or metformin explain an incidence difference between that cohort and the citing authors’ patients; that explanation is the citing authors’ own speculation. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Unwin N, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Alberti KGMM. Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycemia: the current status on definition and intervention. Diabet Med 2002; 19: 708-723.
  2. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabet Care 1997; 20: 1183-1197.
  3. Shaw J, Zimmet P, de Courten M, et al. Impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance: what best predicts future diabetes in Mauritius? Diabet Care 1999; 22: 399-402.
  4. de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Stehouwer CD, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, Heine RJ. The 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria versus the 1985 World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of abnormal glucose tolerance: poor agreement in the Hoorn Study. Diabet Care 1998; 21: 1686-1690.
  5. Abdul-Ghani MA, Jenkinson CP, Richardson DK, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Insulin secretion and action in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: results from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study. Diabetes 2006; 55: 1430-1435.
  6. Abdul-Ghani MA, Jenkinson C, Richardson D, DeFronzo RD. Impaired early but not late phase insulin secretion in subjects with impaired fasting glucose. Eur J Clin Invest 2008; (in press).
  7. Zhou W, Gu Y, Li H, Luo M. Assessing 1-h plasma glucose and shape of the glucose curve during oral glucose tolerance test. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 155: 191-197.
  8. Kanauchi M, Kimura K, Kanauchi K, Saito Y. Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity contribute to the shape of plasma glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test in non-diabetic individuals. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 427-432.
  9. Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Shirkavand F, Machicao F, Häring H, Stumvoll M. Assessing the shape of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test. Diabet Care 2003; 26: 1026-1033.
  10. Abdul-Ghani MA, Williams K, DeFronzo R, Stern M. Risk of progression to type 2 diabetes based on relationship between postload plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose. Diabet Care 2006; 29: 1613-1618.
  11. Groop L, Forsblom C, Lehtovirta M, et al. Metabolic conse- quences of a family history of NIDDM (the Botnia study): evidence for sex-specific parental effects. Diabetes 1996; 45: 1585-1593.
  12. Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic glucose clamp. Diabet Care 1999; 22: 1462-1470.
  13. Nathan DM, Davidson MB, DeFronzo RA, et al. American Diabetes Association. Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care. Diabet Care 2007; 30: 753-759.
  14. Copyright  2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010; 26: 280-286. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr 15207560, 2010, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.1084, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI
  15. Abdul-Ghani MA, Matsuda M, Balas B, DeFronzo RA. Muscle and liver insulin resistance indexes derived from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabet Care 2007; 30: 89-94.
  16. Hanley AJ, Williams K, Gonzalez C, et al. Prediction of type 2 diabetes using simple measures of insulin resistance: combined results from the San Antonio Heart Study, the Mexico City Diabetes Study, and the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes 2003; 52: 463-469.
  17. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM, Pratley RE. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 787-794.
  18. Abdul-Ghani MA, Williams K, DeFronzo RA, Stern M. What is the best predictor of future type 2 diabetes? Diabet Care 2007; 30: 1544-1548.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdul‐Ghani, M. A., Lyssenko, V., Tuomi, T., DeFronzo, R. A., & Groop, L.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
280-286
ISSN
  • 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-7560
OpenAlex
W2101702701
Cited by
139
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Folkhälsanin Tutkimussäätiö
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Samfundet Folkhälsan
  • Diabetestutkimussäätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes risk, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, non-diabetic patients
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Cholesterol, HDL, Male, Triglycerides, Body Mass Index, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review