Cited by 84Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

GLP‐1 receptor agonist added to insulin versus basal‐plus or basal‐bolus insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Castellana, Marco, Cignarelli, Angelo, Brescia, Francesco, Laviola, Luigi, Giorgino, Francesco·2019·Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

Abstract

Background Current guidelines recommend that antihyperglycaemic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving the HbA 1c target on basal insulin should be intensified with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or basal-plus/basal-bolus (BP/BB) insulin regimen. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of GLP-1RA/insulin combinations versus BP/BB. Methods The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017079547). PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until July 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting HbA 1c , body weight, daily insulin dose, hypoglycaemic events, and discontinuation due to lack of efficacy were included. A subgroup analysis on different combinations of GLP-1RA and insulin was performed. Results Out of 1885 retrieved papers, 13 RCTs were included in the review. Compared with BP/BB, GLP-1RA/insulin combinations were associated with a similar HbA 1c reduction (Δ = -0.06%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.14 to 0.02; P = 0.13; I 2 = 52%), greater weight loss (Δ = -3.72 kg; 95% CI, -4.49 to -2.95; P 2 = 89%), and lower incidence of hypoglycaemic events (relative risk [RR] = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.55; P 2 = 99%). The daily insulin dosage among GLP-1RA/insulin users was 30.3 IU/day (95% CI, -41.2 to -19.3; P 2 = 94%), lower than with BP/BB. No difference was found for discontinuation due to lack of efficacy. Conclusions The present review supports treatment intensification wi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dmrr.3082

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castellana, M., Cignarelli, A., Brescia, F., Laviola, L., & Giorgino, F.
Affiliations
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Corresponding author
Giorgino, Francesco
Venue
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-18
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
e3082-e3082
ISSN
  • 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-7560
OpenAlex
W2894901807
Cited by
84
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, multiple daily insulin injections, type 2 diabetes, insulin intensification, HbA1c, weight loss, hypoglycemia, insulin dose reduction, treatment discontinuation, glycemic control, body weight
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review