Cited by 36Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Vascular and metabolic effects of metformin added to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Liu, Ying‐Shan, Chen, Chu‐Na, Chen, Zhen‐Guo, Peng, Yu, Lin, Xiao‐Pu, Xu, Ling‐Ling·2020·Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

Abstract

Background The incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is increasing among youth worldwide, translating to an increased risk ofearly-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD). Mounting studies have shown that metformin may reduce maximal carotidintima-media thickness (cIMT), improve insulin resistance and metabolic control in subjects with T1DM, and thus, may extend cardioprotective benefits. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of metformin added to insulin therapy on reducing CVD risks and improving metabolism in T1DM. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared metformin and insulin combination (duration ≥3 months) to insulin treatment alone in T1DM. Data were expressed as weighted/standardized mean differences (MDs/SMDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the overall certainty of the evidence. Results Nineteen RCTs (n = 1540) met the eligibility criteria. Metformin treatment significantly reduced carotid artery intima-media thickness (MD -0.06 mm [95% CI -0.88, -0.28], P Conclusions Metformin with insulin has the potential to retard the progression of atherosclerosis and provides better metabolic control in patients with T1DM, and thus, providing a potential th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dmrr.3334

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Chen, C., Chen, Z., Peng, Y., Lin, X., & Xu, L.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen Hospital Southern Medical University Shenzhen China
  • Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University Guangzhou China
Venue
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
e3334-e3334
ISSN
  • 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-7560
OpenAlex
W3021761012
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2016A030313521)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
metformin, insulin therapy, type 1 diabetes, carotid intima-media thickness, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk, insulin sensitivity, glycemic control, lipid profile, blood pressure, weight gain, diabetic ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis, hypoglycemia, gastrointestinal adverse effects
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Metformin, Prognosis, Vascular Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review