Cited by 277Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, but not estradiol, enhance survival of new hippocampal neurons in adult male rats

Spritzer, Mark D., Galea, Liisa A.M.·2007·Developmental Neurobiology

Abstract

Past research suggested that androgens may play a role in the regulation of adult neurogenesis within the dentate gyrus. We tested this hypothesis by manipulating androgen levels in male rats. Castrated or sham castrated male rats were injected with 5-Bromo-2'deoxyuridine (BrdU). BrdU-labeled cells in the dentate gryus were visualized and phenotyped (neural or glial) using immunohistochemistry. Castrated males showed a significant decrease in 30-day cell survival within the dentate gyrus but there was no significant change in cell proliferation relative to control males, indicating that androgens positively affect cell survival, but not cell proliferation. To examine the role of testosterone on hippocampal cell survival, males were injected with testosterone s.c. for 30 days starting the day after BrdU injection. Higher doses (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) but not a lower dose (0.25 mg/kg) of testosterone resulted in a significant increase in neurogenesis relative to controls. We next tested the role of testosterone's two major metabolites, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and estradiol, upon neurogenesis. Thirty days of injections of DHT (0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg) but not estradiol (0.010 and 0.020 mg/kg) resulted in a significant increase in hippocampal neurogenesis. These results suggest that testosterone enhances hippocampal neurogenesis via increased cell survival in the dentate gyrus through an androgen-dependent mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dneu.20457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 82 · Cited by 277

Authors
Spritzer, M. D., & Galea, L. A. M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Spritzer, Mark D.
Venue
Developmental Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
67
Issue
10
Pages
1321-1333
ISSN
  • 1932-8451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-846X
OpenAlex
W1986662149
Cited by
277
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
adult neurogenesis, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, estradiol, androgens, cell survival, cell proliferation, castration, BrdU labeling, male rats
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Castration, Cell Differentiation, Cell Survival, Estrogens, Hippocampus, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Dihydrotestosterone, Stem Cells, Testosterone, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neuroprotective Agents, Dentate Gyrus, Cell Proliferation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review