Structural Characterization of Nitazene Analogs Using Electrospray Ionization–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (ESI–MS/MS)
Abstract
Nitazene analogs are potent novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) that are becoming increasingly common and pose a threat to the public because of their fentanyl‐like effects. Although 12 nitazene analogs are currently classified as Schedule I under the U.S. Controlled Substances Act, novel analogs continue to emerge, making their identification in forensic laboratories exceedingly difficult. Liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI–MS/MS) is commonly utilized in toxicology laboratories and is becoming more common for seized drug analysis, particularly for compounds less suited for gas chromatography–electron ionization–mass spectrometry (GC–EI–MS). This study provides a comprehensive structural characterization of 38 representative nitazene analogs using LC–ESI–MS/MS instrumentation, including the proposed fragmentation mechanisms that lead to the formation of diagnostic product ions, enabling analog differentiation. General fragmentation pathways and mechanisms are proposed for all nitazene analogs, including inductive cleavages and molecular rearrangements. Overall, the most common product ions for nitazene analogs are derived from the substitutions to the amine or benzyl moieties, such as m/z 100, m/z 72, m/z 44, and m/z 107. However, the presence of different substitutions shifts the observed product ions. For example, recently occurring piperidine or pyrrolidine rings produce diagnostic product ions at m/z 112 and m/z 98, respectively. Therefore, modification to the core nitazene structure produces different diagnostic product ions, which can be used to identify existing and novel analogs. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the fragmentation behavior of nitazene analogs under ESI–MS/MS conditions, which provides the basis for identifying new structural modifications in novel nitazene analogs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based techniques, such as liquid chromatography-triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, have become the preferred approaches for screening and quantification in forensic and toxicological laboratories.
“Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based techniques, such as liquid chromatography–triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry, have become the preferred approaches for screening and quantification in forensic and toxicological laboratories.”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
These advanced LC-MS systems can achieve the low limits of detection and quantification required for nitazenes.
“These advanced systems can achieve the low limits of detection and quantification required.”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
High-resolution mass spectrometry is particularly valuable for non-targeted screening and structural elucidation of new nitazene analogues.
“High-resolution mass spectrometry is particularly valuable for non-targeted screening and structural elucidation of new analogues [52,53,54,55,56].”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Hardwick, E. K., & Davidson, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Sam Houston State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davidson, J. Tyler
- Venue
- Drug Testing and Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-07-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2127-2140
- ISSN
- 1942-7603 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-7611
- OpenAlex
- W4412016527
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug Testing and Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Commerce (60NANB23D092)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Keywords
- novel synthetic opioids, fentanyl analogs, fragmentation pathways, structural characterization, piperidine ring, pyrrolidine ring, seized drug analysis, forensic toxicology, LC-ESI-MS/MS
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Opioid, Chromatography, Liquid, Illicit Drugs, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review