Motor neuron‐expressed micro RNA s 218 and their enhancers are nested within introns of Slit2/3 genes
Abstract
Summary: miR218‐1 and miR218‐2 are embedded in introns of SLIT2 and SLIT3, respectively, an arrangement conserved throughout vertebrate genomes. Both miR218 genes are predicted to be transcribed in the same orientation as their host genes and were assumed to be spliced from Slit2/3 primary transcripts. In zebrafish miR218 is active in cranial nerve motor nuclei and spinal cord motor neurons, while slit2 and slit3 are expressed predominantly in the midline. This differential expression pattern suggested independent regulation of miR218 genes by distinct enhancers. We tested conserved noncoding elements for regulatory activity by reporter gene transgenesis in zebrafish. Two human enhancers, 76 kb and 130 kb distant from miR218‐2, were identified that drove GFP expression in zebrafish in an almost complete miR218 expression pattern. In the zebrafish slit3 locus, two enhancers with identical activity were discovered. In human SLIT2 one enhancer 52 kb upstream of miR218‐1 drove an expression pattern very similar to the enhancers of miR218‐2. This establishes that miR218‐1/‐2 regulatory units are nested within SLIT2/3 and that they are duplicates of an ancestral single locus. Due to the strong activity of the enhancers, unique transgenic lines were created that facilitate morphological and gene functional genetic experiments in motor neurons. genesis 53:321–328, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
miR-218 is enriched in motor neurons of other organisms.
“recent work indicates that miR-218 is en-riched in MNs of other organisms (Kapsimali et al., 2007;Punnamoottil et al., 2015)”
From MicroRNA Profiling Reveals Marker of Motor Neuron Disease in ALS Models (2017) · cites this paper as Punnamoottil et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MicroRNA Profiling Reveals Marker of Motor Neuron Disease in ALS Models
Hoye, M. L., Koval, E. D., Wegener, A. J., Hyman, T. S., Yang, C., O'Brien, D. R., Miller, R. L., Cole, T., Schoch, K. M., Shen, T., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3582-16.2017 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
<i>miR‐124</i> Contributes to the functional maturity of microglia
Svahn, A. J., Giacomotto, J., Graeber, M. B., Rinkwitz, S., & Becker, T. S. (2016) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.22328 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Punnamoottil, B., Rinkwitz, S., Giacomotto, J., Svahn, A. J., & Becker, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Brain and Mind Research Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney Camperdown New South Wales Australia
- Venue
- genesis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-28
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 321-328
- ISSN
- 1526-954X
- 1526-968X
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review