Cited by 146Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Perfectionism in anorexia nervosa: A 6–24 month follow-up study

Sutandar‐Pinnock, Kalam, Blake Woodside, D., Carter, Jacqueline C., Olmsted, Marion P., Kaplan, Allan S.·2003·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective This study examined the relationship between perfectionism and outcome in anorexia nervosa (AN). Method Seventy-three patients received inpatient treatment for AN. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) at admission to (n = 55), at discharge (n = 27), and at a median of 15.9 months (n = 49) after inpatient treatment. At follow-up, participants also completed the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS) and their scores were compared with those of healthy controls. Results EDI Perfectionism was associated with illness status. A lower EDI Perfectionism score at admission was associated with a better response to treatment, which was subsequently associated with better outcome at follow-up. Both the good and poor outcome groups had significantly higher MPS total perfectionism scores than healthy controls. Discussion The EDI measures an aspect of perfectionism that is sensitive to illness status, whereas the MPS is less dependent on clinical state and may reflect a common personality trait that persists with remission of disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.10127

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In people with AN who are anxious, harm-avoidant, and perfectionistic, the reinforcement from dietary rules may strongly contribute to illness persistence.

    “For individuals with AN who tend to be anxious, highly harm avoidant (Sancho, Arija, & Canals, 2008), and perfectionistic (Egan et al., 2007; Sutandar-Pinnock, Woodside, Carter, Olmstead, & Kaplan, 2003), the reinforcing properties of dietary rules may be an important factor influencing illness intractability.”

    From A Pilot Study of an Acceptance-Based Separated Family Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa (2013) · cites this paper as Sutandar-Pinnock, Woodside, Carter, Olmstead, & Kaplan, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutandar‐Pinnock, K., Blake Woodside, D., Carter, J. C., Olmsted, M. P., & Kaplan, A. S.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-25
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
225-229
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2141028945
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) (submittedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
perfectionism, anorexia nervosa, treatment outcomes, inpatient care, Eating Disorder Inventory, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, personality traits, remission
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Personality Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review