Familial and sociopsychopathological risk factors for suicide attempt in bulimic and in depressed women: Prospective study
Abstract
Objective: This study was carried out to examine sociopsychopathological predictors of prospective observed suicide attempts in bulimic women purging type without comorbid major depression (BNG) at the time of study entry and in woman with major depression without comorbid eating disorder at the time of study entry (MDG). Methods: Data from 28 BNG (age 23.5 ± 3.6) and 126 MDG women (age 33.4 ± 5.1) who had attempted suicide during 12 months' monitoring were compared. Results: A univariate comparison of the two groups revealed various differences. Analysis of risk factors for suicide attempts using stepwise logistic regression was conducted separately for each group. The derived logistic models showed that patients from the BNG group had a history of higher incidence of sexual abuse in childhood, as well as abuse of laxatives and illicit drugs; they also lacked orientation in life, felt lonely despite family and friends, tended to direct their anger outward, and were unable to relax. Conclusions: Sociopsychopathological risk factors for suicide attempts in the BNG and MDG appear to vary. © 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2006
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Six studies (seven analyses) explored the unadjusted relationship between loneliness and suicidal behaviour, with only two finding a significant association; these two were the only studies to include self-harm without suicidal intent as an outcome variable.
“Six studies (seven analyses) explored the unadjusted relationship between loneliness and suicidal behaviour with only two of these studies finding a significant loneliness- suicidal behaviour association; these studies were also the only two studies to include self-harm without suicidal intent as an outcome variable”
From Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies (2020) · cites this paper as Nickel et al. 2006
Nickel et al. (2006) and Salzinger et al. (2007) reported that their samples did not reflect their target populations.
“Nickel et al. (2006) and Salzinger et al. (2007) reported that their samples did not reflect their target populations.”
From Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies (2020) · cites this paper as Nickel et al. (2006)
Of the seven studies to measure suicidal behaviour, three identified a significant association; this included the three studies where self-harm was included as an outcome variable.
“Of the seven studies to measure suicidal behaviour, three identified a significant association; this included the three studies where self-harm was included as an outcome variable (Junker et al., 2017; Nickel et al., 2006; Wichstrøm, 2009).”
From Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies (2020) · cites this paper as Nickel et al., 2006
Nickel (2006) recruited a combination of inpatient, outpatient and community-based participants with a larger sample size and identified loneliness as a significant predictor of later suicidal behaviour.
“Additionally, Nickel (2006) recruited a combination of inpatient, outpatient and community-based participants with a larger sample size and identified loneliness as a significant predictor of later suicidal behaviour.”
From Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies (2020) · cites this paper as Nickel (2006)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Nickel, M. K., Simek, M., Lojewski, N., Muehlbacher, M., Fartacek, R., Kettler, C., Bachler, E., Egger, C., Rother, N., Buschmann, W., Gil, F. P., Kaplan, P., Mitterlehner, F. O., Anvar, J., Rother, W. K., Loew, T. H., & Nickel, C.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
- Ameos Klinikum Inntal (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nickel, Marius K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 410-417
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W1996174239
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- suicide attempts, bulimia nervosa, major depressive disorder, women, risk factors, child sexual abuse, laxative abuse, illicit drug use, loneliness, anger, family history (medicine), psychopathology
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Bulimia, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Major Depressive Disorder, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Comorbidity, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
