Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Shapiro, Jennifer R., Berkman, Nancy D., Brownley, Kimberly A., Sedway, Jan A., Lohr, Kathleen N., Bulik, Cynthia M.·2007·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The RTI International‐University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence‐based Practice Center systematically reviewed evidence on efficacy of treatment for bulimia nervosa (BN), harms associatedwith treatments, factors associated with treatment efficacy, and differential outcome by sociodemographic characteristics. Method: We searched six major databases published from 1980 to September 2005 in all languages against a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria; we focused on eating, psychiatric or psychological, and biomarker outcomes. Results: Forty‐seven studies of medication only, behavioral interventions only, and medication plus behavioral interventions for adults or adolescents met our inclusion criteria. Fluoxetine (60 mg/day) decreases the core symptoms of binge eating and purging and associated psychological features in the short term. Cognitive behavioral therapy reduces core behavioral and psychological features in the short and long term. Conclusion: Evidence for medication or behavioral treatment for BN is strong, for self‐help is weak; for harms related to medication is strong but either weak or nonexistent for other interventions; and evidence for differential outcome by sociodemographic factors is nonexistent. Attention to sample size, standardization of outcome measures, attrition, and reporting of abstinence from target behaviors are required. Longer follow‐up intervals, innovative treatments, and attention to sociodemographic factors would enhance the literature. © 2007 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2007

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.20372

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1002/eat.10222 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00004850-200101000-00003 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/01.jcp.0000150222.31007.a9 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199901)25:1<19::AID-EAT3>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199905)25:4<361::AID-EAT1>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  6. 10.1002/erv.2400020405 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.639 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00149-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/BF03339719 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/1098-108X(199305)13:4<359::AID-EAT2260130404>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1192/bjp.168.1.94 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)09062-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1055/s-2007-1014424 · DOI
  14. 10.3109/00048679709065073 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/00004714-199602000-00003 · DOI
  16. 10.1192/bjp.166.5.660 · DOI
  17. 10.4088/JCP.v64n1109 · DOI
  18. 10.3109/08039489509011912 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/00004714-199312000-00007 · DOI
  20. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.96 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00004714-198908000-00004 · DOI
  22. 10.1176/ajp.148.9.1206 · DOI
  23. 10.1176/ajp.150.1.37 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.4088/JCP.v64n1208 · DOI
  25. 10.1055/s-2007-979488 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00041-7 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00004714-200106000-00008 · DOI
  28. 10.1176/ajp.149.1.82 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Agras W, 1994, One‐year follow‐up of psychosocial and pharmacologic treatments for bulimia nervosa, J Clin Psychiatry, 55, 179
  30. 10.1002/eat.10092 · DOI
  31. 10.1176/ajp.154.4.523 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1037/0022-006X.67.4.451 · DOI
  33. Fairburn CG, 1995, Overcoming Binge Eating
  34. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.2.215 · DOI
  35. 10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.459 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1017/S0033291798006618 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/eat.10137 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00033-T · DOI
  39. 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810290075014 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S003329170100410X · DOI
  41. 10.1097/00005768-200202000-00002 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/0022-006X.61.2.296 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1037/0022-006X.70.2.267 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1002/eat.1058 · DOI
  45. 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820180009001 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.696 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0010-440X(98)90062-1 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/eat.10126 · DOI
  49. 10.1192/bjp.159.2.250 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/eat.20003 · DOI
  51. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.973 · DOI
  52. Durand M, 2003, Specialist treatment versus self‐help for bulimia nervosa: A randomised controlled trial in general practice, Br J Gen Pract, 53, 371
  53. 10.1176/ajp.155.7.947 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90088-3 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/S0033291798007405 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/eat.10265 · DOI
  57. Cooper P, 1993, Bulimia Nervosa: A Guide to Recovery
  58. 10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199701)21:1<17::AID-EAT2>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, J. R., Berkman, N. D., Brownley, K. A., Sedway, J. A., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-16
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
321-336
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2102673609
Cited by
630
References
5
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eat.20372
The paper
Shapiro, J. R., Berkman, N. D., Brownley, K. A., Sedway, J. A., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007). Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20372

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.