Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of cognitive-behavior therapy efficacy research on eating disorders: a case study from a community-based clinical setting
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: There is a growing consensus that there is a need to test the real-world effectiveness of eating disorder therapies that show promise in efficacy research. This article provides a narrative account of an NIMH-funded study that attempted to apply efficacy findings from CBT research to an Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) at the largest community-based eating disorder program in the United States. METHOD: We describe the study as originally envisioned as well as the various challenges that the researchers and the IOP staff encountered in implementing this study. RESULTS: The different training, assumptions, and "ways of knowing" of the research team and the treatment staff in regard to the nature of eating disorders and their treatment created multiple challenges for both groups during the study period. We describe valuable lessons learned about how to-and how not to-implement effectiveness designs in clinical settings that are relatively unfamiliar with empirically-based research findings. DISCUSSION: It is hoped that our experience in attempting to apply efficacy-based research findings on eating disorders treatment in a community-based clinical setting will prove helpful to other researchers and service providers engaging in such translational research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Residential treatment providers suggest that existing manuals for eating disorders do not adequately address comorbidity.
“residential treatment providers suggest that existing manuals for EDs do not adequately address comorbidity (12).”
From The Renfrew Unified Treatment for Eating Disorders and Comorbidity: Long-Term Effects of an Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Residential Treatment (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
The 'Approach to Comorbidity' section reports that intensive outpatient staff wanted co-occurring problems to be a primary treatment focus and were reluctant to follow the CBT approach for some patients. It does not report residential providers making this suggestion or say that existing eating-disorder manuals inadequately address comorbidity. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is evidence of institutional resistance to adopting evidence-based methods.
“there is also evidence of institutional resistance to adopting evidence-based methods”
From Therapist drift redux: Why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track (2016) · cites this paper as Lowe et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]Vitousek K Fairburn CG Brownell KD 2002 Cognitive behaviour therapy in the treatment of anorexia nervosa Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handwork 2 308 313 New York Guilford Press
- Authors
- Lowe, M. R., Bunnell, D. W., Neeren, A. M., Chernyak, Y., & Greberman, L.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lowe, Michael R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-18
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- PMC
- PMC2891876
- OpenAlex
- W2111872830
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH071691)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- eating disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, real-world effectiveness, intensive outpatient treatment, community-based treatment, translational research, research-practice gap, ways of knowing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Goals, Humans, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Biomedical Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review