The therapeutic alliance in the early part of cognitive‐behavioral therapy for the eating disorders
Open accessAbstract
Objective This study examined the strength of the therapeutic alliance in the early stages of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for the eating disorders, and whether the strength of that alliance is associated with early eating characteristics, comorbid Axis 1 and 2 features. Method Forty-four eating-disordered patients completed measures of eating and Axis 1 and 2 characteristics at the start of therapy, and measures of the therapeutic alliance and eating characteristics at the sixth session of CBT. Results The therapeutic alliance was strong, including in the domain of attachment. It was unrelated to initial eating pathology and early changes in eating cognitions and behaviors. However, there were links between initial emotional and interpersonal features and therapeutic alliance by the sixth session. Discussion The findings counter suggestions that CBT for eating disorders is characterized by a poor therapeutic relationship. The therapeutic alliance is likely to be enhanced by addressing high levels of emotional distress and difficulties in interpersonal function where appropriate. This research needs to be extended to other therapies, other domains of function and different time points in therapy, to build a fuller picture of the role of the therapeutic relationship in working with the eating disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eating-disordered patients of CBT clinicians rate the working alliance relatively positively.
“the eating-disordered patients of CBT clinicians rate the working alliance relative positively (Waller, Evans & Stringer, 2012)”
From Clinicians' concerns about delivering cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders (2014) · cites this paper as Waller, Evans & Stringer, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Waller, G., Evans, J., & Stringer, H.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Waller, Glenn
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-14
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-69
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W2030972679
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- therapeutic relationship, cognitive behavioral therapy, eating disorders, early treatment, attachment, emotional distress, interpersonal functioning
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Professional-Patient Relations, Transference, Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review