The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination‐questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the reliability of scores on the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire (EDE‐Q) and to examine the validity of their use as measures of eating disorder symptoms. Method: Articles describing the psychometric properties of the EDE and EDE‐Q were identified in a systematic search of major computer databases and a review of reference lists. Articles were selected based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Fifteen studies were identified that examined the psychometrics of the EDE, whereas 10 studies were found that examined the psychometrics of the EDE‐Q. Discussion: Both instruments demonstrated reliability of scores. There is evidence that scores on the EDE and EDE‐Q correlate with scores on measures of similar constructs and support for using the instruments to distinguish between cases and non‐cases. Additional research is needed to broaden the generalizability of the findings. © 2011 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2012;)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The EDE-Q has demonstrated good reliability and validity both in its original version [33] and in Spanish [32].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Lippa, N. C., & Sanderson, S. C. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353712 · Cited by 6,095
The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa
Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. (1979) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700030762 · Cited by 3,617
Binge eating: nature, assessment, and treatment
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4640 · Cited by 1,801
Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders
Ghaderi, A. (2008) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070802473239 · Cited by 1,244
Mond, J., Hay, P., Rodgers, B., Owen, C., & Beumont, P. J. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00161-x · Cited by 1,124
The Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination and its Subscales
Cooper, Z., Cooper, P., & Fairburn, C. (1989) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.154.6.807 · Cited by 705
Cooper, Z., & Fairburn, C. G. (1987) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t03975-000 · Cited by 494
Peterson, C. B., Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., Joiner, T., Crow, S. J., Mitchell, J. E., Bardone‐Cone, A. M., Klein, M., & le Grange, D. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20373 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fairburn CG, 2008, Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders, 309
- Wilson GT, 1993, Binge Eating: Nature, Assessment, and Treatment, 227
- Spitzer RL, 1993, Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns‐Revised
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI).
Forbush, K. T., Wildes, J. E., Pollack, L. O., Dunbar, D., Luo, J., Patterson, K., Petruzzi, L. J., Pollpeter, M. J., Miller, H. L., Stone, A. M., et al. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0032639 · Cited by 506
Norms and discriminative validity of the eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q)
Aardoom, J. J., Dingemans, A. E., Slof Op't Landt, M. C. T., & Van Furth, E. F. (2012) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.09.002 · Cited by 427
Gideon, N., Hawkes, N., Mond, J., Saunders, R., Tchanturia, K., & Serpell, L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152744 · Cited by 419
Sonneville, K. R., & Lipson, S. K. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22846 · Cited by 384
Lavender, J. M., Brown, T. A., & Murray, S. B. (2017) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0787-5 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, K. C., Peterson, C. B., Frazier, P., & Crow, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berg, Kelly C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 428-438
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- PMC
- PMC3668855
- OpenAlex
- W2108548170
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH082761)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK050456)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- Eating Disorder Examination, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, eating disorders, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, screening tool
- MeSH terms
- Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Physical Examination, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review