Cited by 67Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

An 8‐item short form of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire adapted for children ( ChEDE‐Q8 )

Open access
Kliem, Sören, Schmidt, Ricarda, Vogel, Mandy, Hiemisch, Andreas, Kiess, Wieland, Hilbert, Anja·2017·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Eating disturbances are common in children placing a vulnerable group of them at risk for full‐syndrome eating disorders and adverse health outcomes. To provide a valid self‐report assessment of eating disorder psychopathology in children, a short form of the child version of the Eating Disorder Examination ( ChEDE‐Q ) was psychometrically evaluated. Similar to the EDE‐Q , the ChEDE‐Q provides assessment of eating disorder psychopathology related to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge‐eating disorder; however, the ChEDE‐Q does not assess symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica, or rumination disorder. In 1,836 participants ages 7 to 18 years, recruited from two independent population‐based samples, the factor structure of the recently established 8‐item short form EDE‐Q8 for adults was examined, including measurement invariance analyses on age, gender, and weight status derived from objectively measured weight and height. For convergent validity, the ChEDE‐Q global score, body esteem scale, strengths and difficulties questionnaire, and sociodemographic characteristics were used. Item characteristics and age‐ and gender‐specific norms were calculated. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed good model fit for the 8‐item ChEDE‐Q . Measurement invariance analyses indicated strict invariance for all analyzed subgroups. Convergent validity was provided through associations with well‐established questionnaires and age, gender, and weight status, in expected directions. The newly developed ChEDE‐Q8 proved to be a psychometrically sound and economical self‐report assessment tool of eating disorder psychopathology in children. Further validation studies are needed, particularly concerning discriminant and predictive validity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22658

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 67

Authors
Kliem, S., Schmidt, R., Vogel, M., Hiemisch, A., Kiess, W., & Hilbert, A.
Affiliations
  • Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony (DE)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Corresponding author
Kliem, Sören
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-25
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
679-686
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2579906737
Cited by
67
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Hi 1111/1–1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, eating disorder psychopathology, children, adolescents, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, self-report measures, factor structure, measurement invariance, convergent validity, body esteem, weight status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review