An 8‐item short form of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire adapted for children ( ChEDE‐Q8 )
Open accessAbstract
Eating disturbances are common in children placing a vulnerable group of them at risk for full‐syndrome eating disorders and adverse health outcomes. To provide a valid self‐report assessment of eating disorder psychopathology in children, a short form of the child version of the Eating Disorder Examination ( ChEDE‐Q ) was psychometrically evaluated. Similar to the EDE‐Q , the ChEDE‐Q provides assessment of eating disorder psychopathology related to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge‐eating disorder; however, the ChEDE‐Q does not assess symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica, or rumination disorder. In 1,836 participants ages 7 to 18 years, recruited from two independent population‐based samples, the factor structure of the recently established 8‐item short form EDE‐Q8 for adults was examined, including measurement invariance analyses on age, gender, and weight status derived from objectively measured weight and height. For convergent validity, the ChEDE‐Q global score, body esteem scale, strengths and difficulties questionnaire, and sociodemographic characteristics were used. Item characteristics and age‐ and gender‐specific norms were calculated. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed good model fit for the 8‐item ChEDE‐Q . Measurement invariance analyses indicated strict invariance for all analyzed subgroups. Convergent validity was provided through associations with well‐established questionnaires and age, gender, and weight status, in expected directions. The newly developed ChEDE‐Q8 proved to be a psychometrically sound and economical self‐report assessment tool of eating disorder psychopathology in children. Further validation studies are needed, particularly concerning discriminant and predictive validity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ChEDE-Q8 is suitable for nonclinical as well as clinical populations and has good psychometric properties.
“The ChEDE-Q8 is suitable for nonclinical as well as clinical populations and has good psychometric properties [146]”
From Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [146]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Kliem, S., Schmidt, R., Vogel, M., Hiemisch, A., Kiess, W., & Hilbert, A.
- Affiliations
- Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony (DE)
- Leipzig University (DE)
- University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kliem, Sören
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-25
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 679-686
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W2579906737
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ul.qucosa.de
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Hi 1111/1–1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, eating disorder psychopathology, children, adolescents, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, self-report measures, factor structure, measurement invariance, convergent validity, body esteem, weight status
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review