Enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders adapted for a group setting
Abstract
Objective This randomized control trial is an evaluation of the effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT-E) for eating disorders adapted for a group setting. The study aimed to examine the effects of group CBT-E on eating disorder psychopathology and additional maintaining pathology. Method A transdiagnostic sample of individuals with eating disorders with a BMI ≥ 18 kg/m 2 (N = 40) were randomized to an immediate-start or delayed-start condition so as to compare therapeutic effects of group CBT-E with a waitlist control. Global Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) scores, BMI, and measures of Clinical Perfectionism, Self-Esteem, Interpersonal Difficulties, and Mood Intolerance were measured across the 8-week control period, throughout the group treatment and at 3-months post-treatment. Results Over 70% of those who entered the trial completed treatment. The first eight weeks of group CBT-E were more effective at reducing Global EDE-Q scores than no treatment (waitlist control). By post-treatment, good outcome (a Global EDE-Q within 1 SD of Australian community norms plus BMI ≥ 18.5) was achieved by 67.9% of treatment completers and 66.7% of the total sample. Symptom abstinence within the previous month was reported by 14.3% of treatment completers and 10.3% of the total sample. Significant reductions in Clinical Perfectionism, Self-Esteem, Interpersonal Difficulties, and Mood Intolerance were also observed. Discussion This study demonstrated…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing CBT-ED groups have good outcomes.
“Existing CBT-ED groups have good outcomes (Wade et al., 2017), but briefer versions could support better access for patients.”
From Brief group cognitive‐behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa and binge‐eating disorder: A pilot study of feasibility and acceptability. (2023) · cites this paper as Wade et al., 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Wade, S., Byrne, S., & Allen, K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wade, Stephanie
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 863-872
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W2613371740
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- eating disorders, group therapy, transdiagnostic treatment, treatment effectiveness, clinical perfectionism, self-esteem, interpersonal problems, treatment availability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Psychopathology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review