Patients' experiences of brief cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders: A qualitative investigation
Abstract
Objective: Although it is important to analyze the effectiveness of new therapies, it is also necessary to consider how patients experience them. This is particularly important if we are to maximize treatment acceptability and reduce attrition. This study examined patient experiences of a new 10‐session cognitive‐behavioral therapy (CBT‐T), using a qualitative approach. Method: The sample was 17 patients with a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa who had received CBT‐T (including treatment completers and non‐completers) within the previous 2 years. Sample size was determined by saturation of the emergent themes. Responses were analyzed using a six‐step thematic analysis process. Results: Rated acceptability and effectiveness of CBT‐T were high. Five themes emerged, with subthemes. The key elements of patient experience of the therapy were: the therapeutic relationship; the nature of the therapy; its challenging but beneficial aspects; ending therapy; and the overall experience of CBT‐T (including comparison with other therapies). Discussion: The findings build on the effectiveness research for CBT‐T, suggesting that it is an acceptable therapy that addresses many of the same themes that matter to patients as other therapies. The findings show that patients were positive about CBT‐T relative to other therapies, and offer suggestions as to how CBT‐T might be delivered to emphasize the importance of the time‐limited nature of the therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., O’Connor, M. E., Bohn, K., Hawker, D. M., Wales, J. A., & Palmer, R. L. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Clark, D. M. (2011) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2011.606803 · Cited by 699 · see citing works
Waller, G., Tatham, M., Turner, H., Mountford, V. A., Bennetts, A., Bramwell, K., Dodd, J., & Ingram, L. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22837 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationRose, C., & Waller, G. (2017) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22778 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moore, E., & Waller, G. (2023) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23935 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hoskins, J. I., Blood, L., Stokes, H. R., Tatham, M., Waller, G., & Turner, H.
- Affiliations
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Turner, Hannah
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 530-537
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W2914787221
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- brief cognitive behavioral therapy, bulimia nervosa, eating disorders, patient experience, treatment acceptability, treatment discontinuation, therapeutic relationship, ending therapy, time-limited therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review