Cochrane Review: Universal school‐based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people
Abstract
Background: Alcohol misuse in young people is cause of concern for health services, policy makers, prevention workers, criminal justice system, youth workers, teachers, parents. This is one of three reviews examining the effectiveness of (1) school‐based, (2) family‐based, and (3) multi‐component prevention programs. Objectives: To review evidence on the effectiveness of universal school‐based prevention programs in preventing alcohol misuse in school‐aged children up to 18 years of age. Search methods: Relevant evidence (up to 2002) was selected from the previous Cochrane review. Later studies, to July 2010, were identified from MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Project CORK, and PsycINFO. Selection criteria: Randomized trials evaluating universal school‐based prevention programs and reporting outcomes for alcohol use in students 18 years of age or younger were included. Two reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full text of identified records. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers extracted relevant data independently using an a priori defined extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed. Main results: 53 trials were included, most of which were cluster‐randomised. The reporting quality of trials was poor, only 3.8% of them reporting adequate method of randomisation and program allocation concealment. Incomplete data was adequately addressed in 23% of the trials. Due to extensive heterogeneity across interventions, populations, and outcomes, the results were summarized only qualitatively. Six of the 11 trials evaluating alcohol‐specific interventions showed some evidence of effectiveness compared to a standard curriculum. In 14 of the 39 trials evaluating generic interventions, the program interventions demonstrated significantly greater reductions in alcohol use either through a main or subgroup effect. Gender, baseline alcohol use, and ethnicity modified the effects of interventions. Results from the remaining 3 trials with interventions targeting cannabis, alcohol, and/or tobacco were inconsistent. Authors' conclusions: This review identified studies that showed no effects of preventive interventions, as well as studies that demonstrated statistically significant effects. There was no easily discernible pattern in characteristics that would distinguish trials with positive results from those with no effects. Most commonly observed positive effects across programs were for drunkenness and binge drinking. Current evidence suggests that certain generic psychosocial and developmental prevention programs can be effective and could be considered as policy and practice options. These include the Life Skills Training Program, the Unplugged program, and the Good Behaviour Game. A stronger focus of future research on intervention program content and delivery context is warranted. Plain Language Summary: Psychosocial and Developmental Alcohol Misuse Prevention in Schools can be effective We conducted a Cochrane systematic review of 53 well‐designed experimental studies that examined the effectiveness of school‐based universal programs for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young people. The studies were divided into two major groups based on the nature of the prevention program: 1) programs targeting specifically prevention or reduction of alcohol misuse and 2) generic programs with wider focus for prevention (e.g., other drug use/abuse, antisocial behavior). In the review we found studies that showed no effects of the preventive program, as well as studies that demonstrated statistically significant effects. There was no easily discernible pattern in program characteristics that would distinguish studies with positive results from those with no effects. Most commonly observed positive effects across programs were for drunkenness and binge drinking. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that certain generic psychosocial and developmental prevention programs can be effective and could be considered as policy and practice options. These include the Life Skills Training Program, the Unplugged program, and the Good Behaviour Game.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Universal school-based preventive interventions showed some evidence of effectiveness compared to a standard curriculum for alcohol use.
“Universal school-based preventive interventions showed some evidence of effectiveness compared to a standard curriculum [55].”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 156 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Foxcroft, D. R., & Tsertsvadze, A.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Foxcroft, David R
- Venue
- Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 450-575
- ISSN
- 1557-6272 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977599465
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 156
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Keywords
- usage, youth, school-based prevention, universal prevention, alcohol prevention, binge drinking, drunkenness, psychosocial interventions, developmental prevention, Unplugged program, intervention effectiveness, trial quality, risk of bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review