Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ConR: An R package to assist large‐scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data

Open access
Dauby, Gilles, Stévart, Tariq, Droissart, Vincent, Cosiaux, Ariane, Deblauwe, Vincent, Simo‐Droissart, Murielle, Sosef, Marc S. M., Lowry, Porter P., Schatz, George E., Gereau, Roy E., Couvreur, Thomas L. P.·2017·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

The Red List Categories and the accompanying five criteria developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) provide an authoritative and comprehensive methodology to assess the conservation status of organisms. Red List criterion B, which principally uses distribution data, is the most widely used to assess conservation status, particularly of plant species. No software package has previously been available to perform large‐scale multispecies calculations of the three main criterion B parameters [extent of occurrence (EOO), area of occupancy (AOO) and an estimate of the number of locations] and provide preliminary conservation assessments using an automated batch process. We developed ConR, a dedicated R package, as a rapid and efficient tool to conduct large numbers of preliminary assessments, thereby facilitating complete Red List assessment. ConR (1) calculates key geographic range parameters (AOO and EOO) and estimates the number of locations sensu IUCN needed for an assessment under criterion B; (2) uses this information in a batch process to generate preliminary assessments of multiple species; (3) summarize the parameters and preliminary assessments in a spreadsheet; and (4) provides a visualization of the results by generating maps suitable for the submission of full assessments to the IUCN Red List. ConR can be used for any living organism for which reliable georeferenced distribution data are available. As distributional data for taxa become increasingly available via large open access datasets, ConR provides a novel, timely tool to guide and accelerate the work of the conservation and taxonomic communities by enabling practitioners to conduct preliminary assessments simultaneously for hundreds or even thousands of species in an efficient and time‐saving way.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.3704

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Dauby, G., Stévart, T., Droissart, V., Cosiaux, A., Deblauwe, V., Simo‐Droissart, M., Sosef, M. S. M., Lowry, P. P., Schatz, G. E., Gereau, R. E., & Couvreur, T. L. P.
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12
Volume
7
Issue
24
Pages
11292-11303
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774648065
Cited by
228
References
2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ConR: An R package to assist large‐scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ece3.3704
The paper
Dauby, G., Stévart, T., Droissart, V., Cosiaux, A., Deblauwe, V., Simo‐Droissart, M., Sosef, M. S. M., Lowry, P. P., Schatz, G. E., Gereau, R. E., & Couvreur, T. L. P. (2017). ConR: An R package to assist large‐scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3704

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.