Cited by 20Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

An efficient pipeline for ancient DNA mapping and recovery of endogenous ancient DNA from whole-genome sequencing data

Open access
Xu, Wenhao, Lin, Yu, Zhao, Keliang, Li, Haimeng, Tian, Yinping, Ngatia, Jacob Njaramba, Ma, Yue, Sahu, Sunil Kumar +7 more·2021·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Ancient DNA research has developed rapidly over the past few decades due to improvements in PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, but challenges still exist. One major challenge in relation to ancient DNA research is to recover genuine endogenous ancient DNA sequences from raw sequencing data. This is often difficult due to degradation of ancient DNA and high levels of contamination, especially homologous contamination that has extremely similar genetic background with that of the real ancient DNA. In this study, we collected whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 6 ancient samples to compare different mapping algorithms. To further explore more effective methods to separate endogenous DNA from homologous contaminations, we attempted to recover reads based on ancient DNA specific characteristics of deamination, depurination, and DNA fragmentation with different parameters. We propose a quick and improved pipeline for separating endogenous ancient DNA while simultaneously decreasing homologous contaminations to very low proportions. Our goal in this research was to develop useful recommendations for ancient DNA mapping and for separation of endogenous DNA to facilitate future studies of ancient DNA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.7056

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 20

Authors
Xu, W., Lin, Y., Zhao, K., Li, H., Tian, Y., Ngatia, J. N., Ma, Y., Sahu, S. K., Guo, H., Guo, X., Xu, Y. C., Liu, H., Kristiansen, K., Lan, T., & Zhou, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • Northeast Forestry University (CN)
  • Forest Inventory and Planning Institute of Jilin Province Changchun China
  • College of Wildlife Resources Northeast Forestry University Harbin China
Corresponding author
Zhou, Xinying
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-21
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
390-401
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114070225
Cited by
20
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (26000000, XDB26000000)
  • Government of Jiangxi Province
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
ancient DNA, read mapping, deamination, depurination, DNA fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review