Cited by 0Crustacean biology and ecologyGenetic diversity and population structureInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology

A Prickly Problem: Genome Skimming Reveals Varying Levels of Phylogenetic Diversity in the Freshwater Crayfish Euastacus armatus Complex (Parastacidae) With Implications for Taxonomy and Conservation

Open access
Austin, Christopher M., Ahyong, Shane T., Miller, Adam, Raadik, Tarmo A., Lintermans, Mark, McCormack, Rob, Zukowski, Sylvia, Hammer, Michael P. +4 more·2026·Ecology and Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate resolution of species taxonomies and natural distributions is paramount to enable effective conservation and management. But this can be a challenge in systems that lack sufficient genomic resources and systematic research, and when species ranges are dynamic due to population decline, human‐mediated introduction, or responses to climate change. This is particularly true for many of the world's 690 species of freshwater crayfish, including Australia's endemic spiny crayfish from the Euastacus genus. In this study, we use genome skimming to successfully recover whole mitogenomes and nuclear markers to examine the molecular taxonomy, phylogeography and range uncertainty in a wide‐ranging complex, which includes the nationally Vulnerable Murray crayfish Euastacus armatus , the nationally Endangered Glenelg spiny crayfish E. bispinosus and the Southern Victorian spiny crayfish E. yarraensis . The analyses revealed high levels of genetic structure in both E. armatus and E. yarraensis , including sufficiently divergent lineages within E. yarraensis that potentially warrants independent taxonomic recognition. Furthermore, analyses resolved the status of E. armatus populations persisting outside known contemporary ranges as being relictual and of high conservation importance. Whilst one outlying population of E. bispinosus was confirmed as relictual, another was revealed as being translocated. This study demonstrates genome skimming as a powerful technique for generating molecular data to support key elements of conservation for freshwater crayfish and other species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.73428

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 73

Authors
Austin, C. M., Ahyong, S. T., Miller, A., Raadik, T. A., Lintermans, M., McCormack, R., Zukowski, S., Hammer, M. P., Grandjean, F., Gilligan, D. M., Beitzel, M., & Whiterod, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Australian Museum (AU)
  • Cesar Australia Brunswick Victoria Australia
  • Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • Australian Aquatic Biological Pty Ltd Karuah New South Wales Australia
  • Nature Glenelg Trust Victor Harbor South Australia Australia
  • Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory Darwin Northern Territory Australia
  • Laboratoire Ecologie, Biologie des Interactions, Équipe Ecologie, Evolution, Symbiose Université de Poitiers Poitiers France
  • Bush Heritage Australia (AU)
  • ACT Government (AU)
  • Goyder Institute for Water Research (AU)
Corresponding author
Whiterod, Nick S.
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
e73428-e73428
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414299015
Cited by
0
References
73
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Deakin University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Keywords
freshwater crayfish, Parastacidae, genome skimming, molecular taxonomy, phylogeography, phylogenetic diversity, relict populations, translocation, range uncertainty, conservation genetics, mitochondrial genome, nuclear markers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review