A Prickly Problem: Genome Skimming Reveals Varying Levels of Phylogenetic Diversity in the Freshwater Crayfish Euastacus armatus Complex (Parastacidae) With Implications for Taxonomy and Conservation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Accurate resolution of species taxonomies and natural distributions is paramount to enable effective conservation and management. But this can be a challenge in systems that lack sufficient genomic resources and systematic research, and when species ranges are dynamic due to population decline, human‐mediated introduction, or responses to climate change. This is particularly true for many of the world's 690 species of freshwater crayfish, including Australia's endemic spiny crayfish from the Euastacus genus. In this study, we use genome skimming to successfully recover whole mitogenomes and nuclear markers to examine the molecular taxonomy, phylogeography and range uncertainty in a wide‐ranging complex, which includes the nationally Vulnerable Murray crayfish Euastacus armatus , the nationally Endangered Glenelg spiny crayfish E. bispinosus and the Southern Victorian spiny crayfish E. yarraensis . The analyses revealed high levels of genetic structure in both E. armatus and E. yarraensis , including sufficiently divergent lineages within E. yarraensis that potentially warrants independent taxonomic recognition. Furthermore, analyses resolved the status of E. armatus populations persisting outside known contemporary ranges as being relictual and of high conservation importance. Whilst one outlying population of E. bispinosus was confirmed as relictual, another was revealed as being translocated. This study demonstrates genome skimming as a powerful technique for generating molecular data to support key elements of conservation for freshwater crayfish and other species.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 73
- Authors
- Austin, C. M., Ahyong, S. T., Miller, A., Raadik, T. A., Lintermans, M., McCormack, R., Zukowski, S., Hammer, M. P., Grandjean, F., Gilligan, D. M., Beitzel, M., & Whiterod, N. S.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Australian Museum (AU)
- Cesar Australia Brunswick Victoria Australia
- Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research (AU)
- University of Canberra (AU)
- Australian Aquatic Biological Pty Ltd Karuah New South Wales Australia
- Nature Glenelg Trust Victor Harbor South Australia Australia
- Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory Darwin Northern Territory Australia
- Laboratoire Ecologie, Biologie des Interactions, Équipe Ecologie, Evolution, Symbiose Université de Poitiers Poitiers France
- Bush Heritage Australia (AU)
- ACT Government (AU)
- Goyder Institute for Water Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Whiterod, Nick S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e73428-e73428
- ISSN
- 2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13096719
- OpenAlex
- W4414299015
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Deakin University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Keywords
- freshwater crayfish, Parastacidae, genome skimming, molecular taxonomy, phylogeography, phylogenetic diversity, relict populations, translocation, range uncertainty, conservation genetics, mitochondrial genome, nuclear markers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review