The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs
Open accessAbstract
To date, it has been thought that endophytic fungi in forbs infect the leaves of their hosts most commonly by air‐borne spores (termed “horizontal transmission”). Here, we show that vertical transmission from mother plant to offspring, via seeds, occurs in six forb species (Centaurea cyanus, C. nigra, Papaver rhoeas, Plantago lanceolata, Rumex acetosa, and Senecio vulgaris), suggesting that this may be a widespread phenomenon. Mature seeds were collected from field‐grown plants and endophytes isolated from these, and from subsequent cotyledons and true leaves of seedlings, grown in sterile conditions. Most seeds contain one species of fungus, although the identity of the endophyte differs between plant species. Strong evidence for vertical transmission was found for two endophyte species, Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium sphaerospermum. These fungi were recovered from within seeds, cotyledons, and true leaves, although the plant species they were associated with differed. Vertical transmission appears to be an imperfect process, and germination seems to present a bottleneck for fungal growth. We also found that A. alternata and C. sphaerospermum occur on, and within pollen grains, showing that endophyte transmission can be both within and between plant generations. Fungal growth with the pollen tube is likely to be the way in which endophytes enter the developing seed. The fact that true vertical transmission seems common suggests a more mutualistic association between these fungi and their hosts than has previously been thought, and possession of endophytes by seedling plants could have far‐reaching ecological consequences. Seedlings may have different growth rates and be better protected against herbivores and pathogens, dependent on the fungi that were present in the mother plant. This would represent a novel case of trans‐generational resistance in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The seed microbiome: Origins, interactions, and impacts
Nelson, E. B. (2018) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3289-7 · Cited by 560
The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years
Rosenberg, E., & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0457-9 · Cited by 537
Transmission of Bacterial Endophytes
Frank, A., Saldierna Guzmán, J., & Shay, J. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5040070 · Cited by 478
Shahzad, R., Khan, A. L., Bilal, S., Asaf, S., & Lee, I.-J. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00024 · Cited by 312
Sohrabi, R., Paasch, B. C., Liber, J. A., & He, S. Y. (2023) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-032704 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodgson, S., de Cates, C., Hodgson, J., Morley, N. J., Sutton, B. C., & Gange, A. C.
- Venue
- Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1199-1208
- ISSN
- 2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057931057
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ece3.953
- The paper
- Hodgson, S., de Cates, C., Hodgson, J., Morley, N. J., Sutton, B. C., & Gange, A. C. (2014). Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.