The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence
Open accessAbstract
Although observations of species‐rich communities have long served as a primary motivation for research on the coexistence of competitors, the majority of our empirical and theoretical understanding comes from two‐species systems. How much of the coexistence observed in species‐rich communities results from indirect effects among competitors that only emerge in diverse systems remains poorly understood. Resolving this issue requires simple, scalable, and intuitive metrics for quantifying the conditions for coexistence in multispecies systems, and how these conditions differ from those expected based solely on pairwise interactions. To achieve these aims, we develop a structural approach for studying the set of parameter values compatible with n‐species coexistence given the geometric constraints imposed by the matrix of competition coefficients. We derive novel mathematical metrics analogous to stabilizing niche differences and fitness differences that measure the range of conditions compatible with multispecies coexistence, incorporating the effects of indirect interactions emerging in diverse systems. We show how our measures can be used to quantify the extent to which the conditions for coexistence in multispecies systems differ from those that allow pairwise coexistence, and apply the method to a field system of annual plants. We conclude by presenting new challenges and empirical opportunities emerging from our structural metrics of multispecies coexistence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography
Jetschke, G. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1771:tuntob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,993
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
Levins, R. (1968) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691209418 · Cited by 5,302
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
Harper, J. L., & Tilman, D. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259756 · Cited by 4,180
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
Hutchinson, G. E. (1961) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282171 · Cited by 3,074
Will a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors
Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00823 · Cited by 1,623
Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice
Bender, E. A., Case, T. J., & Gilpin, M. E. (1984) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939452 · Cited by 1,245
Cited by
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34
“This concept has been extended across disciplines, from network topology to language [31,32], and also applies to ecological systems [28,33].”
BackgroundSelf-citationMedeiros, L. P., Boege, K., del-Val, E., Zaldívar-Riverón, A., & Saavedra, S. (2021) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/711663 · Cited by 25
Self-citationUnderstanding the impact of third-party species on pairwise coexistence
Deng, J., Taylor, W., & Saavedra, S. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010630 · Cited by 20
Self-citationCooperation Maximizes Biodiversity
Godoy, O., Calleja-Solanas, V., Soler-Toscano, F., Portillo, J. R., Suárez, A., & Langa, J. A. (2026) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/741536 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Saavedra, S., Rohr, R. P., Bascompte, J., Godoy, O., Kraft, N. J. B., & Levine, J. M.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 470-486
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2606411644
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 17.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ecm.1263
- The paper
- Saavedra, S., Rohr, R. P., Bascompte, J., Godoy, O., Kraft, N. J. B., & Levine, J. M. (2017). A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.