The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An attribute‐diversity approach to functional diversity, functional beta diversity, and related (dis)similarity measures
Open accessAbstract
Based on the framework of attribute diversity (a generalization of Hill numbers of order q), we develop a class of functional diversity measures sensitive not only to species abundances but also to trait‐based species‐pairwise functional distances. The new method refines and improves on the conventional species‐equivalent approach in three areas: (1) the conventional method often gives similar values (close to unity) to assemblages with contrasting levels of functional diversity; (2) when a distance metric is unbounded, the conventional functional diversity depends on the presence/absence of other assemblages in the study; (3) in partitioning functional gamma diversity into alpha and beta components, the conventional gamma is sometimes less than alpha. To resolve these issues, we add to the attribute‐diversity framework a novel concept: τ, the threshold of functional distinctiveness between any two species; here, τ can be chosen to be any positive value. Any two species with functional distance ≥ τ are treated as functionally equally distinct. Our functional diversity quantifies the effective number of functionally equally distinct species (or “virtual functional groups”) with all pairwise distances at least τ for different species pairs. We advocate the use of two complementary diversity profiles (τ profile and q profile), which depict functional diversity with varying levels of τ and q, respectively. Both the conventional species‐equivalent method (i.e., τ is the maximum of species‐pairwise distances) and classic taxonomic diversity (i.e., τ is the minimum of non‐zero species‐pairwise distances) are incorporated into our proposed τ profile for an assemblage. For any type of species‐pairwise distance matrices, our attribute‐diversity approach allows proper diversity partitioning, with the desired property gamma ≥ alpha and thus avoids all the restrictions that apply to the conventional diversity decomposition. Our functional alpha and gamma are interpreted as the effective numbers of functionally equally distinct species, respectively, in an assemblage and in the pooled assemblage, while beta is the effective number of equally large assemblages with no shared species and all species in the assemblages being equally distinct. The resulting beta diversity can be transformed to obtain abundance‐sensitive Sørensen‐ and Jaccard‐type functional (dis)similarity profiles. Hypothetical and real examples are used to illustrate the framework. Online software and R codes are available to facilitate computations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K., & Mirotchnick, N. (2011) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x · Cited by 2,396 · cited 2×
“…diversity, widely regarded as a key to understanding ecosystem processes and response to environmental stress or disturbance (Tilman et al. 1997, Cadotte et al. 2011, Naeem et al. 2012) is typically quantified by using measures based on species trait values and any measure of species…”
MethodPLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION
Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billès, G., Navas, M.-L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., et al. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0799 · Cited by 2,313
A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances
Mouillot, D., Graham, N. A. J., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H., & Bellwood, D. R. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004 · Cited by 2,117
Self-citation
Cited by
mFD: an R package to compute and illustrate the multiple facets of functional diversity
Magneville, C., Loiseau, N., Albouy, C., Casajus, N., Claverie, T., Escalas, A., Leprieur, F., Maire, E., Mouillot, D., & Villéger, S. (2022) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05904 · Cited by 406
Self-citationLearning the syntax of plant assemblages
Leblanc, C., Bonnet, P., Servajean, M., Thuiller, W., Chytrý, M., Aćić, S., Argagnon, O., Biurrun, I., Bonari, G., Bruelheide, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-025-02105-7 · Cited by 10
Learning the syntax of plant assemblages
(2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304381/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, A., Chiu, C., Villéger, S., Sun, I., Thorn, S., Lin, Y., Chiang, J., & Sherwin, W. B.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-25
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2901806538
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An attribute‐diversity approach to functional diversity, functional beta diversity, and related (dis)similarity measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ecm.1343
- The paper
- Chao, A., Chiu, C., Villéger, S., Sun, I., Thorn, S., Lin, Y., Chiang, J., & Sherwin, W. B. (2019). An attribute‐diversity approach to functional diversity, functional beta diversity, and related (dis)similarity measures. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.