The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Floodplain Transition Zone Hydrodynamics: The Role of Riparian and Floodplain Vegetation in Compound Channel Flows
Abstract
During floods, many rivers exhibit a compound channel configuration, resulting in significant interactions between the flows in the main channel and the floodplains. Due to its water and nutrient‐rich soils, floodplains are often covered by shallow vegetation and riparian woodland at the interface of the floodplain and the main channel. Owing to the numerous overtopping scenarios, compound channels are viable in both urban and natural watercourses having floodplains with riparian shrubs, in‐line woodland and transplanted trees with different arrangements dictated by shading, species, spacing and occupation of the floodplains. This study investigates the influence of submerged floodplains and combinations of riparian grass, woodlands and shrubs on flow resistance and structure. An experimental campaign was conducted, generating 11 uniform compound channel flows under four different configurations: (i) without vegetation, (ii) with synthetic grass in the floodplains, (iii) with synthetic grass in the floodplains and rods at the floodplain edge and (iv) with synthetic grass in the floodplains and artificial shrubs at the floodplain edge. Primarily, flow mechanisms and turbulence characteristics for three uniform flow depths are analyzed using acoustic Doppler velocity measurements. Then, the increase in flow resistance and reduction of compound channel conveyance capacity were analyzed for individual cases. The synthetic grass in the floodplains minimally influenced the cross‐sectional distribution of streamwise velocity, turbulence intensities and lateral shear. On the other hand, riparian vegetation significantly affected these distributions by impeding lateral shear spreading. The effects of vegetation on flow structure were enhanced by foliage on vegetation elements. Additionally, the study examined coherent two‐dimensional large structures and secondary currents, revealing that riparian vegetation is critical in altering flow patterns. These findings provide valuable insights into the complex interactions between vegetation and flow dynamics in compound channels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While riparian vegetation is a cornerstone of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) for erosion control and biodiversity, it significantly increases hydraulic roughness, which can impede flow conveyance and elevate flood stages during extreme discharge events 7,8 .”
From AI-driven digital twinning quantifies the trade-off between flood conveyance and riparian stability under climate extremes (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“While riparian vegetation is a cornerstone of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) for erosion control and biodiversity, it significantly increases hydraulic roughness, which can impede flow conveyance and elevate flood stages during extreme discharge events 7,8 .”
From AI-driven digital twinning quantifies the trade-off between flood conveyance and riparian stability under climate extremes (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1080/24705357.2025.2450823 · DOI
- Arcement G. J. andV. R.Schneider.1989. “Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains.” U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2339 38 p.https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2339. · DOI
- 10.1007/s12205‐020‐1435‐x · DOI
- 10.1080/24705357.2019.1573648 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2005)131:5(408 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021‐013‐9656‐1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐3040.1992.tb00992.x · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943‐7900.00006 · DOI
- Dittrich A. D.Harttmann andA.Gottauf.1999. “Validation of Resistance Formulas of Compound Channels With Field Data.” Proceedings of the 28th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research Graz Austria.
- 10.1080/15715121003714894 · DOI
- 10.1051/e3sconf/20184006035 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11269‐024‐04005‐5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.010 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2002)128:1(117) · DOI
- 10.1002/eco.87 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511524608.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s42241‐025‐0100‐8 · DOI
- 10.3826/jhr.2008.3177 · DOI
- 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635222 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019wr024989 · DOI
- 10.1029/2017WR021087 · DOI
- Knight D. W., 1996, Floodplain Processes (Chapter 5)
- 10.1017/jfm.2020.900 · DOI
- 10.1002/eco.2474 · DOI
- Landcare Notes, 1998, Watercourse re‐Vegetation Using Indigenous Plants
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124429 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13157‐020‐01363‐9 · DOI
- 10.1002/esp.1513 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-1652-0_12 · DOI
- 10.1029/1998WR900069 · DOI
- Nezu I., 1999, Hydraulic Modeling, 17
- 10.1890/060148 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(1985)111:9(1262) · DOI
- 10.1007/s40996‐022‐00904‐y · DOI
- 10.1002/eco.1645 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016WR019873 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103527 · DOI
- River Restoration Centre (RRC), 2002, Manual of River Restoration Techniques
- 10.1017/jfm.2011.199 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13157‐020‐01392‐4 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096‐9837(199609)21:9<817::AID‐ESP618>3.0.CO;2‐4 · DOI
- 10.1080/15715124.2011.584511 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1001‐6058(09)60255‐9 · DOI
- Shiono K. T.Ishigaki R.Kawanaka andF.Heatlie.2009. “Influence of One Line Vegetation on Stage‐Discharge Rating Curves in Compound Channel.” Proceedings of the 33rd Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research Vancouver Canada.
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121298 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021‐012‐9606‐3 · DOI
- 10.2134/jeq2019.01.0020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1051/e3sconf/202126903001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10652‐023‐09960‐y · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2008)134:1(34) · DOI
- Terrier B.2010. “Flow Characteristics in Straight Compound Channels With Vegetation Along the Main Channel.” PhD Thesis Loughborough University.
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2005)131:3(175) · DOI
- 10.1002/eco.2352 · DOI
- 10.1080/00221689009499084 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10652‐020‐09747‐5 · DOI
- 10.1029/2020WR029494 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2007)133:2(148) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shin, J. H., Go, S. H., & Park, J. H. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-63704-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandes, J. N., Singh, P., Leal, J. B., & Cardoso, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Hydraulics and Environment Department National Laboratory of Civil Engineering Lisbon Portugal
- Faculty of Engineering and Science Universitetet i Agder Kristiansand Norway
- CERIS and Instituto Superior Técnico Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
- Venue
- Ecohydrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1936-0584
- 1936-0592
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (2023.08036.CEECIND/CP2847/CT0001, 2024.07287.IACDC)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review