Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Floodplain Transition Zone Hydrodynamics: The Role of Riparian and Floodplain Vegetation in Compound Channel Flows

Fernandes, J. N., Singh, P., Leal, J. B., Cardoso, A. H.·2025·Ecohydrology

Abstract

During floods, many rivers exhibit a compound channel configuration, resulting in significant interactions between the flows in the main channel and the floodplains. Due to its water and nutrient‐rich soils, floodplains are often covered by shallow vegetation and riparian woodland at the interface of the floodplain and the main channel. Owing to the numerous overtopping scenarios, compound channels are viable in both urban and natural watercourses having floodplains with riparian shrubs, in‐line woodland and transplanted trees with different arrangements dictated by shading, species, spacing and occupation of the floodplains. This study investigates the influence of submerged floodplains and combinations of riparian grass, woodlands and shrubs on flow resistance and structure. An experimental campaign was conducted, generating 11 uniform compound channel flows under four different configurations: (i) without vegetation, (ii) with synthetic grass in the floodplains, (iii) with synthetic grass in the floodplains and rods at the floodplain edge and (iv) with synthetic grass in the floodplains and artificial shrubs at the floodplain edge. Primarily, flow mechanisms and turbulence characteristics for three uniform flow depths are analyzed using acoustic Doppler velocity measurements. Then, the increase in flow resistance and reduction of compound channel conveyance capacity were analyzed for individual cases. The synthetic grass in the floodplains minimally influenced the cross‐sectional distribution of streamwise velocity, turbulence intensities and lateral shear. On the other hand, riparian vegetation significantly affected these distributions by impeding lateral shear spreading. The effects of vegetation on flow structure were enhanced by foliage on vegetation elements. Additionally, the study examined coherent two‐dimensional large structures and secondary currents, revealing that riparian vegetation is critical in altering flow patterns. These findings provide valuable insights into the complex interactions between vegetation and flow dynamics in compound channels.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eco.70123

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1080/24705357.2025.2450823 · DOI
  2. Arcement G. J. andV. R.Schneider.1989. “Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains.” U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2339 38 p.https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2339. · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s12205‐020‐1435‐x · DOI
  4. 10.1080/24705357.2019.1573648 · DOI
  5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2005)131:5(408 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10021‐013‐9656‐1 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365‐3040.1992.tb00992.x · DOI
  8. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943‐7900.00006 · DOI
  9. Dittrich A. D.Harttmann andA.Gottauf.1999. “Validation of Resistance Formulas of Compound Channels With Field Data.” Proceedings of the 28th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research Graz Austria.
  10. 10.1080/15715121003714894 · DOI
  11. 10.1051/e3sconf/20184006035 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11269‐024‐04005‐5 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.010 · DOI
  14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2002)128:1(117) · DOI
  15. 10.1002/eco.87 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.03.006 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511524608.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s42241‐025‐0100‐8 · DOI
  19. 10.3826/jhr.2008.3177 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635222 · DOI
  21. 10.1029/2019wr024989 · DOI
  22. 10.1029/2017WR021087 · DOI
  23. Knight D. W., 1996, Floodplain Processes (Chapter 5)
  24. 10.1017/jfm.2020.900 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/eco.2474 · DOI
  26. Landcare Notes, 1998, Watercourse re‐Vegetation Using Indigenous Plants
  27. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124429 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s13157‐020‐01363‐9 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/esp.1513 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.008 · DOI
  31. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1652-0_12 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/1998WR900069 · DOI
  34. Nezu I., 1999, Hydraulic Modeling, 17
  35. 10.1890/060148 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(1985)111:9(1262) · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s40996‐022‐00904‐y · DOI
  38. 10.1002/eco.1645 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/2016WR019873 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103527 · DOI
  41. River Restoration Centre (RRC), 2002, Manual of River Restoration Techniques
  42. 10.1017/jfm.2011.199 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.012 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s13157‐020‐01392‐4 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/(SICI)1096‐9837(199609)21:9<817::AID‐ESP618>3.0.CO;2‐4 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/15715124.2011.584511 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S1001‐6058(09)60255‐9 · DOI
  48. Shiono K. T.Ishigaki R.Kawanaka andF.Heatlie.2009. “Influence of One Line Vegetation on Stage‐Discharge Rating Curves in Compound Channel.” Proceedings of the 33rd Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research Vancouver Canada.
  49. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121298 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10021‐012‐9606‐3 · DOI
  51. 10.2134/jeq2019.01.0020 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.12.004 · DOI
  53. 10.1051/e3sconf/202126903001 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s10652‐023‐09960‐y · DOI
  55. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2008)134:1(34) · DOI
  56. Terrier B.2010. “Flow Characteristics in Straight Compound Channels With Vegetation Along the Main Channel.” PhD Thesis Loughborough University.
  57. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2005)131:3(175) · DOI
  58. 10.1002/eco.2352 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/00221689009499084 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.03.008 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s10652‐020‐09747‐5 · DOI
  62. 10.1029/2020WR029494 · DOI
  63. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9429(2007)133:2(148) · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fernandes, J. N., Singh, P., Leal, J. B., & Cardoso, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Hydraulics and Environment Department National Laboratory of Civil Engineering Lisbon Portugal
  • Faculty of Engineering and Science Universitetet i Agder Kristiansand Norway
  • CERIS and Instituto Superior Técnico Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
Venue
Ecohydrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-10
Volume
18
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1936-0584
  • 1936-0592
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (2023.08036.CEECIND/CP2847/CT0001, 2024.07287.IACDC)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review