Cited by 23Turtle Biology and ConservationAmphibian and Reptile BiologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Novel habitat use supports population maintenance in a reconfigured landscape

Open access
O'Bryan, C. J., Homyack, J. A., Baldwin, R. F., Kanno, Y., Harrison, A.‐L.·2016·Ecosphere

Abstract

Given the limited scope of unaltered, protected areas in most regions, understanding the contributions to imperiled species conservation by landscapes in which habitat elements have been reconfigured is critical. Commercial forestry has been a driver of altered structure and composition of forests and of distribution and character of aquatic systems. In eastern North America, extensive historical wetland drainage reconfigured hydrologic environments from low‐gradient wet flats and isolated wetlands to connected networks of linear ditches. Landscapes where both uplands and aquatic environments differ from historic conditions may affect most ecological aspects of semi‐aquatic species, including reptiles. Our objective was to determine if habitat selection and use decisions by spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata), a rare semi‐aquatic species, supported population maintenance in a reconfigured forest landscape in eastern North Carolina,USA. We captured 280 individuals and radiomarked 31 adults to examine habitat selection at multiple spatial scales with paired logistic regression, movements and home ranges with location data and utilization distributions (UDs), survival with a known‐fate model, and abundance with N‐mixture modeling. Across local and landscape scales, turtles selected features associated with ditches despite abundant, more natural aquatic depressions across the study area. Habitat metrics describing understory closure and substrate characteristics were important at local scales, and closed canopy forest and habitat heterogeneity was positively associated with activity areas at landscape‐scale spatial grains. Both movements and home ranges were centered on ditches, and turtles exploited ditches to access mates, nest sites, or uplands for estivation. In this highly reconfigured landscape, this species appeared to have sufficient behavioral plasticity to acquire key resources contributing to high survival and an abundant population. Isolation from road traffic and collection, both which negatively affect turtles elsewhere, was facilitated by limited public access. Our results suggest that conservation and management of rare species should not rely solely on habitat information gained from studies in more pristine areas because such results may not demonstrate the range in variation in behavior that might allow persistence in novel environments, absent key threats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ecs2.1228

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plants, amphibians, fish, crayfish, and turtles have been shown to use ditches to disperse across the landscape, highlighting how ditches can act as connectivity corridors and sometimes mitigate negative effects of habitat fragmentation.

    “Plants, amphibians, fish, crayfish, and turtles have been shown to use ditches to disperse across the landscape, highlighting how ditches can act as connectivity corridors and sometimes mitigate negative effects of habitat fragmentation 12,197,211 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [197]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 23

Authors
O'Bryan, C. J., Homyack, J. A., Baldwin, R. F., Kanno, Y., & Harrison, A. ‐.
Affiliations
  • Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation Clemson University 132 Lehotsky Hall Clemson South Carolina 29634 USA
  • Weyerhaeuser (United States) (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
Venue
Ecosphere
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
ISSN
2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299160717
Cited by
23
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecosphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Weyerhaeuser Company
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
spotted turtle, Clemmys guttata, habitat selection, wetland drainage, ditch network, population maintenance, home range, utilization distribution, survival, behavioral plasticity, rare species conservation, landscape reconfiguration, eastern North Carolina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review