Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preferential prescribing and utilization trends of diabetes medications among patients with renal impairment: Emerging role of linagliptin and other dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors

Patorno, Elisabetta, Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar, Bartels, Dorothee B., Brodovicz, Kimberly G., Liu, Jun, Schneeweiss, Sebastian·2018·Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Summary: Objectives: Although many newer diabetes medications have become available in the last decade, most have not been widely studied in populations with chronic kidney disease under routine care. Linagliptin, a recently marketed dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor, is the only agent in the U.S. that does not require dose adjustment in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) and renal impairment. We sought to describe baseline kidney function and other key characteristics among patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) initiating linagliptin and other diabetes medications, and to explore prescribing patterns among T2DM patients with moderate to severe renal impairment before and after the launch of linagliptin. Design: Using a population‐based cohort study design nested in a large U.S. commercial healthcare dataset linked to laboratory values, we described characteristics of T2DM patients initiating linagliptin and other diabetes medications between May 2011 (launch of linagliptin) and September 2015. We also explored prescribing trends among T2DM patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (ICD‐9 diagnosis code 585.3x‐6x) who initiated linagliptin and other diabetes medications between January 2006 to September 2015 (before and after the launch of linagliptin). Patients: We identified 1,174,476 T2DM patients initiating a diabetes medication (28,900 linagliptin initiators) between 05/2011‐09/2015. We also identified 100,847 T2DM patients with moderate to severe renal impairment initiating a diabetes agent between 01/2006‐09/2015. Results and Conclusion: Among patients initiating newer diabetes medications between 05/2011‐09/2015, those initiating linagliptin had the highest prevalence of moderate to severe renal impairment, suggesting preferential prescribing in routine care. DPP‐4 inhibitors overall were among the most frequently chosen agents among T2DM patients with moderate to severe renal impairment between 01/2006‐09/2015. Further investigation of the safety and effectiveness of DPP‐4 inhibitors in routine care of T2DM patients with renal impairment is needed to either corroborate or discourage current prescribing patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/edm2.5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linagliptin is commonly prescribed for patients with kidney impairment, which could lead to increased confounding in contrast to sitagliptin.

    “This contrasts with saxagliptin, another dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, which has raised concerns regarding potential increased risks of heart failure, and linagliptin, which is commonly prescribed for patients with kidney impairment, and thus could lead to increased confounding in contrast to our comparator sitagliptin.20-25”
  • Saxagliptin has raised concerns regarding potential increased risks of heart failure.

    “This contrasts with saxagliptin, another dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, which has raised concerns regarding potential increased risks of heart failure, and linagliptin, which is commonly prescribed for patients with kidney impairment, and thus could lead to increased confounding in contrast to our comparator sitagliptin.20-25”

    From Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Methods identify saxagliptin as a DPP-4 inhibitor, and the Results discuss its prescribing trends, but neither addresses heart-failure risk. Searches for saxagliptin and heart failure, including hospitalization and cardiovascular safety, found no passage supporting the stated concern. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.020 · DOI
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00009 · DOI
  3. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.04.029 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6936 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/dom.12658 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Patorno, E., Gopalakrishnan, C., Bartels, D. B., Brodovicz, K. G., Liu, J., & Schneeweiss, S.
Affiliations
  • Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
  • Corporate Department Global Epidemiology Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH Ingelheim Germany
  • Global Epidemiology Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ridgefield CT USA
Venue
Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-27
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2398-9238
Cited by
9
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Boehringer Ingelheim

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review