Renal Denervation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (RDT-PEF): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Aim: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with increased sympathetic nervous system (SNS) tone. Attenuating the SNS with renal denervation (RDT) might be helpful and there are no data currently in humans with HFpEF. Methods and results: In this single-centre, randomized, open-controlled study we included 25 patients with HFpEF [preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, left atrial (LA) dilatation or LV hypertrophy and raised B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or echocardiographic assessment of filling pressures]. Patients were randomized (2:1) to RDT with the Symplicity™ catheter or continuing medical therapy. The primary success criterion was not met in that there were no differences between groups at 12 months for Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, peak oxygen uptake (VO2) on exercise, BNP, E/e′, LA volume index or LV mass index. A greater proportion of patients improved at 3 months in the RDT group with respect to VO2 peak (56% vs. 13%, P = 0.025) and E/e′ (31% vs. 13%, P = 0.04). Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was comparable between groups. Two patients required plain balloon angioplasty during the RDT procedure to treat renal artery wall oedema. Conclusion: This study was terminated early because of difficulties in recruitment and was underpowered to detect whether RD improved the endpoints of quality of life, exercise function, biomarkers, and left heart remodelling. The procedure was safe in patients with HFpEF, although two patients did require intraprocedure renal artery dilatation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first clinical trial of renal denervation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was terminated early because of recruitment difficulties and was underpowered to determine whether the procedure had beneficial effects on heart failure symptoms, but it reported that the technique was safe in this patient population.
“The first clinical trial of RDN in patients with HFpEF was terminated early because of recruitment difficulties and so was underpowered to determine whether the procedure had beneficial effects on heart failure symptoms153. However, this study reported that the technique was safe in this patient population.”
From Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception (2025) · cites this paper as [153]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Patel, H. C., Rosen, S. D., Hayward, C., Vassiliou, V., Smith, G. C., Wage, R. R., Bailey, J., Rajani, R., Lindsay, A. C., Pennell, D. J., Underwood, S. R., Prasad, S. K., Mohiaddin, R., Gibbs, J. S. R., Lyon, A. R., & Di Mario, C.
- Affiliations
- Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
- Ealing Hospital (GB)
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
- Royal Brompton Hospital , London ,
- Corresponding author
- Patel, Hitesh C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Heart Failure
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 703-712
- ISSN
- 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
- 1879-0844
- OpenAlex
- W2310229236
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Queen Mary University of London
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0515-10089)
- British Heart Foundation (FS/11/67/28954)
- Imperial College London
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- renal denervation, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, sympathetic nervous system, peak oxygen uptake, left atrial filling pressure, brain natriuretic peptide, left ventricular hypertrophy, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Denervation, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Atria, Heart Failure, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Male, Organ Size, Oxygen Consumption, Renal Artery, Stroke Volume, Sympathectomy, Exercise Tolerance, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review