Cited by 67Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Patient journey after admission for acute heart failure: length of stay, 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality

Open access
Davison, Beth A., Metra, Marco, Senger, Stefanie, Edwards, Christopher, Milo, Olga, Bloomfield, Daniel M., Cleland, John G., Dittrich, Howard C. +7 more·2016·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: The course of patients following admission for acute heart failure (AHF) is of major importance to patients and healthcare providers. We examined predictors and associations of length of stay (LOS), 30-day post-discharge readmission and 90-day post-discharge mortality in 1990 patients enrolled in the PROTECT study. Methods and results: PROTECT was a randomized study that examined the effect of the adenosine blocker rolofylline in patients within 24 h of admission for AHF with mild to moderate renal impairment. Geographic-region-adjusted multivariable models showed that LOS was only partly explained by the severity of heart failure (HF), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, ischaemic heart disease) and degree of metabolic dysfunction (cholesterol and albumin) at baseline (adjusted R2 0.27). Addition of in-hospital worsening heart failure (WHF) and changes in metabolic markers contributed significantly to prediction of LOS [R2 difference 0.050, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0282–0.072]. Thirty-day HF readmission was associated with more severe HF and previous HF admission but not with LOS (odds ratios 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.04). Death within 90 days after discharge was associated with older age, more severe HF, worse renal function, and lower sodium and bicarbonate at admission; LOS was a strong predictor of 90-day post-discharge mortality. Conclusions: In patients admitted for AHF, LOS is not well-predicted by traditional markers of disease severity, but strongly associated with the occurrence of in-hospital WHF. Longer LOS is a strong predictor of early mortality after discharge but not of readmission. These findings may help focus efforts to reduce LOS and post-discharge outcomes on patients’ subgroups at increased risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejhf.540

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 3-month timeframe is clinically and operationally significant as the hospital's diabetes case manager follows up on discharged patients during this period, frequently identified as the high-risk period in the literature.

    “The 3-month timeframe is clinically and operationally significant as the hospital’s diabetes case manager follows up on discharged patients during this period, frequently identified as the high-risk period in the literature [39–41].”

    From Machine learning-driven risk prediction for post-hospitalization diabetes case management: Integrating clinical and social determinants of health (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results sections report readmissions within 30 days and deaths within 90 days after discharge among patients hospitalized for acute heart failure. This supports the relevance of early post-discharge risk, but the paper does not identify the full three-month period as high-risk for discharged diabetes patients. The hospital’s case-manager follow-up is the citing authors’ own context, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB, American Heart Association Statistics Committee, Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics -2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131:e29-e322.
  2. Cleland JG, Swedberg K, Follath F, Komajda M, Cohen-Solal A, Aguilar JC, Dietz R, Gavazzi A, Hobbs R, Korewicki J, Madeira HC, Moiseyev VS, Preda I, van Gilst WH, Widimsky J, Freemantle N, Eastaugh J, Mason J, Study Group on Diagnosis of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. The EuroHeart Failure survey programme -a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis. Eur Heart J 2003;24:442-463.
  3. Di Tano G, De Maria R, Gonzini L, Aspromonte N, Di Lenarda A, Feola M, Marini M, Milli M, Misuraca G, Mortara A, Oliva F, Pulignano G, Russo G, Senni M, Tavazzi L, on the behalf of the IN-HF Outcome Investigators. The 30-day metric in acute heart failure revisited: data from IN-HF Outcome, an Italian nationwide cardiology registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:1032-1041.
  4. Eapen ZJ, Reed SD, Li Y, Kociol RD, Armstrong PW, Starling RC, McMurray JJ, Massie BM, Swedberg K, Ezekowitz JA, Fonarow GC, Teerlink JR, Metra M, Whellan DJ, O'Connor CM, Califf RM, Hernandez AF. Do countries or hospitals with longer hospital stays for acute heart failure have lower readmission rates?: Findings from ASCEND-HF. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6:727-732.
  5. Khan H, Greene SJ, Fonarow GC, Kalogeropoulos AP, Ambrosy AP, Maggioni AP, Zannad F, Konstam MA, Swedberg K, Yancy CW, Gheorghiade M, Butler J, EVEREST Trial Investigators. Length of hospital stay and 30-day readmission fol- lowing heart failure hospitalization: insights from the EVEREST trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:1022-1031.
  6. Mentz RJ, Cotter G, Cleland JG, Stevens SR, Chiswell K, Davison BA, Teerlink JR, Metra M, Voors AA, Grinfeld L, Ruda M, Mareev V, Lotan C, Bloomfield DM, Fiuzat M, Givertz MM, Ponikowski P, Massie BM, O'Connor CM. Inter- national differences in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in acute heart failure patients: better short-term outcomes in patients enrolled in Eastern Europe and Russia in the PROTECT trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16: 614-624.
  7. Heidenreich PA, Sahay A, Kapoor JR, Pham MX, Massie B. Divergent trends in survival and readmission following a hospitalization for heart failure in the Veterans Affairs health care system 2002-2006. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56: 362-368.
  8. Reynolds K, Butler MG, Kimes TM, Rosales AG, Chan W, Nichols GA. Relation of acute heart failure hospital length of stay to subsequent readmission and all-cause mortality. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:400-455.
  9. Massie BM, O'Connor CM, Metra M, Ponikowski P, Teerlink JR, Cotter G, Weath- erley BD, Cleland JG, Givertz MM, Voors A, DeLucca P, Mansoor GA, Salerno CM, Bloomfield DM, Dittrich HC, PROTECT Investigators and Committees. Rolofylline, an adenosine A1-receptor antagonist, in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1419-1428.
  10. Weatherley BD, Cotter G, Dittrich HC, DeLucca P, Mansoor GA, Bloomfield DM, Ponikowski P, O'Connor CM, Metra M, Massie BM, for the PROTECT Steering Committee, Investigators, and Coordinators. Design and rationale of the PROTECT study: a placebo-controlled randomized study of the selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist rolofylline for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure and volume overload to assess treatment effect on congestion and renal function. J Card Fail 2010;16:25-35.
  11. Vergouwe Y. Development and validation of a prediction model with missing predictor data: a practical approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63: 205-214.
  12. Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med 1991;10:585-598.
  13. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361-387. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  14. Cleland JG, Chiswell K, Teerlink JR, Stevens S, Fiuzat M, Givertz MM, Davison BA, Mansoor GA, Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Cotter G, Metra M, Massie BM, O'Connor CM. Predictors of postdischarge outcomes from information acquired shortly after admission for acute heart failure: a report from the Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study of the Selective A1 Adenosine Receptor Antagonist Rolo- fylline for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Volume Overload to Assess Treatment Effect on Congestion and Renal Function (PROTECT) study. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:76-87.
  15. Mentz RJ, Metra M, Cotter G, Milo O, McKendry C, Chiswell K, Davison BA, Cleland JG, Bloomfield DM, Dittrich HC, Fiuzat M, Ponikowski P, Givertz MM, Voors AA, Teerlink JR, O'Connor CM. Early vs. late worsening heart failure during acute heart failure hospitalization: insights from the PROTECT trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:697-706.
  16. Davison BA, Metra M, Cotter G, Massie BM, Cleland JG, Dittrich HC, Edwards C, Filippatos G, Givertz MM, Greenberg B, Ponikowski P, Voors AA, O'Connor CM, Teerlink JR, on behalf of the PROTECT and RELAX-AHF Executive Committees. Worsening heart failure following admission for acute heart failure: a pooled analysis of the PROTECT and RELAX-AHF Studies. JACC Heart Fail 2015;3: 395-403.
  17. Kristensen SL, Kober L, Jhund PS, Solomon SD, Kjekshus J, McKelvie RS, Zile MR, Granger CB, Wikstrand J, Komajda M, Carson PE, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Wedel H, Yusuf S, McMurray JJ. International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Circulation 2015;131:43-53.
  18. Kelly JP, Mentz RJ, Hasselblad V, Ezekowitz JA, Armstrong PW, Zannad F, Felker GM, Califf RM, O'Connor CM, Hernandez AF. Worsening heart failure during hospitalization for acute heart failure: Insights from the Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF). Am Heart J 2015;170:298-305.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davison, B. A., Metra, M., Senger, S., Edwards, C., Milo, O., Bloomfield, D. M., Cleland, J. G., Dittrich, H. C., Givertz, M. M., O’Connor, C. M., Massie, B. M., Ponikowski, P., Teerlink, J. R., Voors, A. A., & Cotter, G.
Affiliations
  • Momentum Research (US)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Klinika Kardiologii , Wroclaw ,
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Davison, Beth A.
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2016-04-25
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1041-1050
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2342548904
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Cytokinetics
  • Singulex
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10227)
  • Vifor Pharma
  • Servier
  • Sphingotec GmbH
  • Relypsa
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
acute heart failure, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, prognostic factors, metabolic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, PROTECT trial, post-discharge outcomes
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Diuretics, Edema, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Patient Readmission, Severity of Illness Index, Xanthines, Comorbidity, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Myocardial Ischemia, Disease Progression, Renal Insufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review