The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monoclonal antibodies OKT 11 and OKT 11A have pan‐T reactivity and block sheep erythrocyte “receptors”
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies OKT11 (γ1) and OKT11A (γ2) are described and appear to have similar binding specificities. They bind, in immunofluorescence, with >95% of infant thymocytes, staining both cortical and medullary cells, 65‐80% of blood lymphocytes and selectively stain the T cell‐dependent paracortical areas of tonsil. A small proportion (9‐12%) of bone marrow lymphocytes stain, but this population excludes the terminal transferase‐positive cells. Both the γ1 and γ2 antibodies stain the surface membrane Ig‐negative lymphocytes in blood and tonsil and are able to block sheep E rosette formation (to normal or leukemic T cells). In contrast, other monoclonal anti‐T reagents tested (OKT1, OKT3, OKT4, OKT6, OKT8, OKT9, OKT10) did not block E rosette formation. E rosette formation and OKT11 binding are coincident on T‐ALL cell lines and both are trypsin‐sensitive. In a series of 145 leukemias and 26 leukemic cell lines investigated, only leukemias with a T cell phenotype including E rosette positivity were reactive with OKT11 and OKT11A. OKT11A binds to a polypeptide of approximately 50000 molecular weight on thymic lymphocytes. This structure may carry the recognition site for sheep erythrocytes. These antibodies provide additional useful markers for T cell analysis and are of potential therapeutic value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meuer, S. C., Hussey, R. E., Fabbi, M., Fox, D., Acuto, O., Fitzgerald, K. A., Hodgdon, J. C., Protentis, J. P., Schlossman, S. F., & Reinherz, E. L. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90039-4 · Cited by 1,113
Seed, B., & Aruffo, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.10.3365 · Cited by 909
Establishment of a human cell line (mono mac 6) with characteristics of mature monocytes
Ziegler‐Heitbroc, H. W. L., Thiel, E., Futterer, A., Herzog, V., Wirtz, A., & Riethmüller, G. (1988) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910410324 · Cited by 553
Pantaleo, G., Olive, D., Harris, D., Poggi, A., Moretta, L., & Moretta, A. (1986) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.1830161228 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Verbi, W., Greaves, M. F., Schneider, C., Koubek, K., Janossy, G., Stein, H., Kung, P., & Goldstein, G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-86
- ISSN
- 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4141
- OpenAlex
- W1999298353
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.