The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular and antigenic heterogeneity of the rat leukocyte‐common antigen from thymocytes and T and B lymphocytes
Abstract
The molecular forms and antigenic heterogeneity of the leukocyte‐common antigen (L‐CA) of rat lymphocytes have been analyzed. Thymocytes show one main band at 180 kDa, T cells four bands at 180,190, 200 and 220 kDa and B cells one broadband at about 240 kDa. T helper and T cytotoxic cell subsets show the same four bands with some differences in the proportion of each. Four mouse monoclonal antibodies (MRC OX‐1, 28, 29 and 30) reacted with all molecular forms of L‐CA and fell into two sets that were noncompetitive in binding to L‐CA (MRC OX‐1, 28, 29 vs. OX‐30). The antigenic determinants seen by all these antibodies were lost when L‐CA was reduced and alkylated. Three antibodies (MRC OX‐22, 31 and 32) reacted selectively with B cells, T cytotoxic cells and about 2/3 of T helper cells. OX‐22 and OX‐31 competed for binding but were noncompetitive with OX‐32. All these antibodies bound to a subfraction of the 190, 200 and 220‐kDa forms of T cell L‐CA but not at all to the 180‐kDa form of T cells or thymocytes. One antibody bound to B cells only (MRC OX‐33) and precipitated a subfraction of B cell L‐CA. With all the antibodies that did not label thymocytes the antigenic determinants survived reduction and alkylation. Subsequent proteolysis with trypsin then destroyed all determinants except the one reacting with MRC OX‐22 antibody, In this case tryptic peptides retained full antigenic activity which was, however, destroyed by further proteolysis with pronase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dhabhar, F. S., Malarkey, W. B., Neri, E., & McEwen, B. S. (2012) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.05.008 · Cited by 589
“In a second panel, we used FITC-conjugated anti-CD62L antibody to identify L-selectin, PE-conjugated OX33, to identify B cells (Woollett et al., 1985), and PECy5-conjugated OX-8 to identify CTLs. Antibody isotype controls were used to set the negative criterion analysis.”
MethodExpression of Leukocyte Common Antigen (CD45) on Various Human Leukemia/Lymphoma Cell Lines
Nakano, A., Harada, T., Morikawa, S., & Kato, Y. (1990) · Acta Pathologica Japonica · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1827.1990.tb01549.x · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Woollett, G. R., Barclay, A. N., Puklavec, M., & Williams, A. F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-173
- ISSN
- 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4141
- OpenAlex
- W2009520704
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.