Cited by 36T-cell and B-cell Immunologyvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mapping T cell recognition: the identification of a T cell receptor residue critical to the specific interaction with an influenza hemagglutinin peptide

Wedderburn, Lucy R., Searle, Stephen J. M., Rees, Anthony R., Lamb, Jonathan R., Owen, Michael J.·1995·European Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The fine specificity of T cell receptor (TCR) interaction with the influenza hemagglutinin peptide HA 307–319 in the context of the DR1 (DRA, DRB1*0101) and DR4 (DRA, DRB1*0404) was studied in two human T cell clones (HA1.7 and Cl‐1) derived from different individuals. Sequencing of amplified TCR transcripts revealed that these two clones express highly related TCRα chains, with a conserved junctional motif, but very different TCRβ chains. Modeling studies led to the prediction that the conserved glutamic acid residue in the TCRα chain could interact with the lysine at position 316 in the peptide, a known TCR contact residue. HA1.7 TCR‐CD3ζ, chimeric constructs were expressed in the rat basophil line (RBL) and shown to confer specific antigen recognition. In two TCRα chain mutants, with the conserved glutamic acid residue altered to alanine and lysine, respectively, peptide recognition was lost. Specific recognition was not rescued by altered peptide ligands. Furthermore, Jurkat derivatives expressing the related Jurkat TCRα chain paired with the HA 1.7 TCRβ chain did not recognize the HA 307–319 /DR1 complex. These data provide evidence for the critical interaction of a TCR residue with antigenic peptide.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eji.1830250627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T cells are extremely sensitive to cognate antigens, sometimes relying on the difference in only one amino acid.

    “T cells are extremely sensitive to cognate antigens, sometimes relying on the difference in only one amino acid. 277,278”

    From Autoimmune Myocarditis, Old Dogs and New Tricks. (2024) · cites this paper as [278]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.002523 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/340443a0 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/368215a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/329506a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/353321a0 · DOI
  6. Chothia C., 1988, EMBO J., 7, 3745, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03258.x · DOI
  7. 10.1038/334395a0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/321219a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90558-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1084/jem.174.6.1371 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/324679a0 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8987 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90068-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.2832942 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/355224a0 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/300066a0 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/intimm/1.5.479 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90139-4 · DOI
  19. Alexander J., 1993, J. Immunol., 150, 1, 10.4049/jimmunol.150.1.1 · DOI
  20. Snoke K., 1993, J. Immunol., 151, 6815, 10.4049/jimmunol.151.12.6815 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/316606a0 · DOI
  22. 10.1084/jem.175.6.1493 · DOI
  23. 10.4049/jimmunol.120.6.2027 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.1598575 · DOI
  25. 10.1089/hyb.1992.11.701 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8214 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1050 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/bi00693a025 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0076-6879(91)03008-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S1058-6687(05)80035-X · DOI
  32. 10.1038/348419a0 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/364033a0 · DOI
  34. 10.1084/jem.164.3.739 · DOI
  35. 1993, WHO ‐ IVIS Nomenclature Subcommittee on TCR Designation, J. Immunol. Methods, 164, 1
  36. 10.1002/eji.1830230702 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90167-J · DOI
  38. 10.1038/334270a0 · DOI
  39. 10.1107/S0021889891004399 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wedderburn, L. R., Searle, S. J. M., Rees, A. R., Lamb, J. R., & Owen, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Owen, Michael J.
Venue
European Journal of Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1654-1662
ISSN
  • 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4141
OpenAlex
W1973940934
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
T cell receptor, T cell recognition, influenza hemagglutinin, MHC class II, HLA-DR1, HLA-DR4, TCR alpha chain, T cell receptor beta chain, T cell clones
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Cell Division, Hemagglutinins, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Mapping, T-Lymphocytes, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta, Conserved Sequence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review