Cited by 24Chemical Synthesis and Analysisvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A retro‐inverso analog mimicks the cognate peptide epitope of a CD4+ T cell clone

Open access

Abstract

Synthetic analogs of peptide epitopes may activate specific T helper cells, antagonize their antigen receptors, or block recognition by competing for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II binding sites. Rationally designed peptides may therefore prove useful as vaccines and for treatment of autoimmune diseases and allergies mediated by CD4+ T cells. However, their susceptibility to proteolytic degradation limits the applicability of conventional peptides in vivo. By contrast, retro‐inverso analogs, in which a native sequence is substituted with D‐amino acids linked with a reversed backbone, resist proteolysis and still maintain the side chain topology of the corresponding natural peptide. We report here that an end group‐modified retro‐inverso analog of the IgG2a b heavy chain allopeptide determinant γ2a b 435–447 was recognized by an I‐A d‐restricted, γ2a b 435–447‐reactive T cell clone. The pseudopeptide elicited near‐maximal interleukin‐2 responses, although 300‐fold higher concentrations were needed than the native determinant. The weaker antigenicity of the retro‐inverso analog could be fully accounted for by an impaired I‐A d binding capacity, which might reflect reduced ability of the distorted main chain to form hydrogen bonds with I‐A d. Glycine substitution at the residue corresponding to the first primary anchor (P1) of the native peptide abrogated I‐A d binding and antigenicity of the retro‐inverso analog. Thus, the pseudopeptide resembled the native determinant with respect to orientation in the class II binding site, configuration of the epitopic side chains, and the constraints that governed the interactions between a major anchoring side chain and I‐A d. In conclusion, proteolytically resistant compounds with predefined capacity to interact with MHC class II allelic products and T cell antigen receptors may be designed by retro‐inverso modification of native determinants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eji.1830270614

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1038/317359a0 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3968 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/334623a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.1 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0952-7915(06)80037-3 · DOI
  6. Fairchild P. J., 1994, Immunology, 81, 487
  7. 10.1038/328395a0 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3296 · DOI
  9. 10.1084/jem.180.6.2353 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0952-7915(95)80033-6 · DOI
  11. Fauchère J.‐L., 1992, Adv. Drug Res., 23, 127
  12. 10.1021/ar50133a001 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/ar00029a007 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0167-7799(00)88999-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9765 · DOI
  16. 10.1074/jbc.270.51.30422 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1021/jm9509511 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/eji.1830211011 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/eji.1830231040 · DOI
  20. 10.1084/jem.165.1.173 · DOI
  21. 10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.003103 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0161-5890(95)00103-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/376431a0 · DOI
  24. Hill C. M., 1994, J. Immunol., 152, 2890, 10.4049/jimmunol.152.6.2890 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/368215a0 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.274.5285.209 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/384134a0 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/368744a0 · DOI
  29. Lamont A. G., 1990, J. Immunol., 144, 2493, 10.4049/jimmunol.144.7.2493 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bartnes, K., Hannestad, K., Guichard, G., & Briand, J. P.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Bartnes, Kristian
Venue
European Journal of Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1387-1391
ISSN
  • 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4141
OpenAlex
W2014383294
Cited by
24
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
D-amino acids, peptide epitopes, CD4+ T cell clones, MHC class II binding, I-Ad, protease resistance, peptide-MHC binding, T cell antigen recognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Epitopes, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Clone Cells, T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Peptides, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review