Ras/PI3Kinase/cofilin‐independent activation of human CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ T cells by superagonistic CD28 stimulation
Open accessAbstract
T cell activation requires costimulation of TCR/CD3 plus accessory receptors (e.g. CD28). A hallmark of costimulation is the dynamic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, important for receptor polarization in the immunological synapse. The classical model of T cell costimulation was challenged by the detection of superagonistic anti‐CD28 antibodies. These induce T cell proliferation and – as demonstrated here – production of IFN‐γ, CD25 and CD69 even in the absence of TCR/CD3 coligation. Here, we analyzed whether superagonistic CD28 stimulation induces costimulatory signaling events. Costimulation leads to phosphorylation of the actin‐bundling protein L‐plastin and dephosphorylation of the actin‐reorganizing protein cofilin. Cofilin binds to F‐actin only in its dephosphorylated form. Binding of cofilin to F‐actin leads to depolymerization or severing of F‐actin. The latter ends up in smaller F‐actin fragments, which can be elongated at the free barbed ends. This results in enhanced actin polymerization. Dephosphorylation of cofilin requires activation of Ras and PI3Kinase. Interestingly, superagonistic CD28 stimulation activates human peripheral blood T cells independently of Ras and PI3Kinase. Accordingly, it does not lead to cofilin dephosphorylation and receptor polarization. Likewise, L‐plastin is not phosphorylated. Thus, superagonistic CD28 stimulation does not mimic costimulation. Instead, it leads to a Ras/PI3Kinase/cofilin‐independent state of “unpolarized T cell activation”.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CD28SA stimulation did not cause obvious differences in CD28 cluster formation compared to conventional CD28 stimulation by confocal laserscanning microscopy.
“However, in line with a recent report [33] we did not see obvious differences in CD28 cluster formation upon CD28SA vs. CD28 stimulation by confocal laserscanning microscopy (data not shown).”
From Signaling Signatures and Functional Properties of Anti-Human CD28 Superagonistic Antibodies (2008) · cites this paper as [33]
The section “Incomplete receptor clustering after 5.11A1 stimulation” (page unavailable) reports an obvious difference: conventional CD3/CD28 stimulation produced large, polarized receptor clusters, whereas superagonistic CD28 stimulation produced only small clusters that did not coalesce at one pole. The “Capping” methods section confirms that the images were obtained by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Sester, U., Wabnitz, G. H., Kirchgessner, H., & Samstag, Y.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Samstag, Yvonne
- Venue
- European Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2881-2891
- ISSN
- 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4141
- OpenAlex
- W1977938086
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB405, SFB405/A4, DFG SA 393/3-3)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- T cell costimulation, cofilin dephosphorylation, actin cytoskeleton remodeling, immunological synapse, CD45RA+ T cells, CD45RO+ memory T cells, IFN-gamma production, CD69, actin polymerization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Cells, Cultured, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Mitogens, Phosphorylation, Rabbits, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Cell Polarity, Leukocyte Common Antigens, CD28 Antigens, ras Proteins, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Actin Depolymerizing Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review