Cited by 13T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Rhoh deficiency reduces peripheral T‐cell function and attenuates allogenic transplant rejection

Open access
Porubsky, Stefan, Wang, Shijun, Kiss, Eva, Dehmel, Stefan, Bonrouhi, Mahnaz, Dorn, Tatjana, Luckow, Bruno, Brakebusch, Cord, Gröne, Hermann‐Josef·2011·European Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Rhoh is a hematopoietic system‐specific GTPase. Rhoh‐deficient T cells have been shown to have a defect in TCR signaling manifested during their thymic development. Our aims were to investigate the phenotype of peripheral Rhoh‐deficient T cells and to explore in vivo the potential benefit of Rhoh deficiency in a clinically relevant situation, in which T‐cell inhibition is desirable. In murine allogenic kidney transplantation, Rhoh deficiency caused a significant 75% reduction of acute and chronic transplant rejection accompanied by 75% lower alloantigen‐specific antibody levels and significantly better graft function. This effect was independent of the lower T‐cell numbers in Rhoh‐deficient recipients, because injection of equal numbers of Rhoh‐deficient or control T cells into kidney transplanted mice with SCID led again to a significant 60% reduction of rejection. Mixed lymphocyte reaction revealed that the weaker alloreactivity was associated with a 85% lower cytotoxicity and a 50–80% lower cytokine release in Rhoh‐deficient T cells without an influence on the secretion itself. Antigen uptake and presentation in DC were unaffected by Rhoh deficiency. These findings stress the importance of Rhoh for the function of peripheral T cells.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Rhoh deficiency in mice attenuates acute and chronic kidney allograft rejection and improves graft function, largely through intrinsic defects in peripheral T-cell activation, cytokine release, and cytotoxicity rather than altered dendritic cell function or lower T-cell numbers alone. The paper proposes Rhoh as a potential target for suppressing T-cell-mediated transplant rejection.

Key findings

  • In murine allogenic kidney transplantation, Rhoh deficiency caused a significant 75% reduction of acute and chronic transplant rejection, 75% lower alloantigen-specific antibody levels, and significantly better graft function.
  • When equal numbers of Rhoh-deficient or control T cells were injected into kidney-transplanted SCID mice, Rhoh-deficient T cells still caused a significant 60% reduction of rejection, indicating the effect was not solely due to lower peripheral T-cell numbers.
  • Mixed lymphocyte reaction showed 85% lower cytotoxicity and 50–80% lower cytokine release in Rhoh-deficient T cells, without an influence on secretion itself; antigen uptake and presentation by dendritic cells were unaffected.
  • Rhoh-deficient T cells showed weaker CD69 upregulation, cytokine secretion, proliferation, and cytotoxicity after TCR stimulation, but no general secretory defect after TCR-independent PMA/A23187 stimulation.

Methods

  • Allogenic BALB/c→C57BL/6 kidney transplantations were performed in bilaterally nephrectomized Rhoh-deficient and control recipients, with syngenic C57BL/6→C57BL/6 transplants as controls; grafts were evaluated at days 7, 21, and 42. SCID recipients received equal numbers (1×10^7) of purified Rhoh-deficient or control T cells immediately after transplantation.
  • In vitro assays included mixed lymphocyte reactions with equal T cells and T cell-depleted BALB/c stimulators, TCR-dependent stimulation with plate-bound anti-CD3 ± anti-CD28, TCR-independent stimulation with PMA and Ca²⁺ ionophore A23187, cytotoxicity assays, BMDC antigen uptake/presentation assays, flow cytometry, and cytokine bead arrays.
  • Histology, immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence, creatinine clearance, and alloreactive antibody titers were assessed; statistical comparisons used two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • The paper states that a deranged mast cell phenotype cannot be ruled out completely as contributing to ameliorated rejection, although SCID experiments with wild-type myeloid cells indicated mast cells were not a prominent contributor.
  • The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section; evident limitations include the use of a mouse renal allograft model without immunosuppressive therapy, global Rhoh deficiency rather than T-cell-specific deletion, and heterozygous Rhoh+/− controls rather than wild-type controls (though the paper states their phenotype did not differ from wild-type).
  • The mechanistic in vitro assays rely on purified splenic T cells and BMDC, so the findings may not fully capture all cell-cell interactions in the transplant microenvironment.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eji.201040420

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

48 Own result · 21 Sources not found · 10 Own interpretation · 5 Own method

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

46 more claims

Create a free account to see all 84 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Porubsky, S., Wang, S., Kiss, E., Dehmel, S., Bonrouhi, M., Dorn, T., Luckow, B., Brakebusch, C., & Gröne, H.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Gröne, Hermann‐Josef
Venue
European Journal of Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
76-88
ISSN
  • 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4141
OpenAlex
W2160701423
Cited by
13
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (LSHB-CT-2005-518167)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 438, SFB405)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
RhoH, Rho GTPases, peripheral T cells, allogeneic kidney transplantation, graft rejection, alloreactivity, cytotoxicity, cytokine production, T cell suppression, dendritic cell antigen presentation, mixed lymphocyte reaction, graft function
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Antibodies, Chronic Disease, Dendritic Cells, Graft Rejection, Isoantigens, Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Mutant Strains, T-Lymphocytes, Transcription Factors, Kidney Transplantation, Cytokines, Mice, SCID, Antigen Presentation, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review