Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of the Polypyridyl (pp) Ligand Size on the DNA Binding Properties, Cytotoxicity and Cellular Uptake of Organoruthenium(II) Complexes of the Type [(η6‐C6Me6)Ru(L)(pp)]n+ [L = Cl, n = 1; L = (NH2)2CS, n = 2]

Schäfer, Sven, Ott, Ingo, Gust, Ronald, Sheldrick, William S.·2007·European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

The DNA binding of polypyridyl (pp) (η 6‐hexamethylbenzene)ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [(η 6‐C 6 Me 6)RuCl(pp)](CF 3 SO 3) (pp = phen, tap, dpq, dppz, dppn) 1–5 and [(η 6‐C 6 Me 6)Ru{(NH 2)2 CS}(pp)](CF 3 SO 3)2 (pp = dpq, dppz, dppn) 6–8 has been studied by UV/Vis spectroscopy, circular dichroism and viscosity measurements. Complexes 3–5, 7 and 8 are potent cytotoxic agents towards the human cancer cell lines MCF‐7 and HT‐29. Stable intercalative binding into CT DNA is indicated for the dpq and dppz complexes by large increases Δ Tm of 12–25 °C in the DNA thermal denaturation temperature for r = [complex]/[DNA] = 0.1. Large viscosity increases for DNA in the presence of 3 and 4 are also in accordance with this binding mode as are the pronounced hypochromic UV/Vis shifts for the π–π* transitions of the dppz ligands of 4 and 7 in the range 360–400 nm. A small Δ Tm value of 2 °C and effectively unchanged viscosity suggest that Ru–N (nucleobase) coordinative binding is thermodynamically preferred for the larger polypyridyl ligand of 5 under equilibrium conditions, as is also the case for the small ligands phen and tap in complexes 1 and 2. CD spectra indicate that the B DNA conformation is essentially retained for interaction with the chloro complexes 1–5 but that very significant distortions occur for the thiourea complexes 6–8. The in vitro cytotoxicities of the chloro complexes 3–5 are dependent on the size of the polypyridyl ligand with IC 50 values increasing in the order dppn < dppz < dpq: for instance IC 50 values of 11.1, 2.12, and 0.13 μ M were determined for 3–5 towards MCF‐7. These values correlate well with the cellular uptake efficiency which increases from 1.1 over 146.6 to 906.7 ng(Ru)/mg (protein) within the series 3–5. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejic.200700206

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Schäfer, S., Ott, I., Gust, R., & Sheldrick, W. S.
Venue
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-21
Volume
2007
Issue
19
Pages
3034-3046
ISSN
  • 1099-0682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-1948
OpenAlex
W2165810890
Cited by
175
References
1
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of the Polypyridyl (pp) Ligand Size on the DNA Binding Properties, Cytotoxicity and Cellular Uptake of Organoruthenium(II) Complexes of the Type [(η6‐C6Me6)Ru(L)(pp)]n+ [L = Cl, n = 1; L = (NH2)2CS, n = 2]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ejic.200700206
The paper
Schäfer, S., Ott, I., Gust, R., & Sheldrick, W. S. (2007). Influence of the Polypyridyl (pp) Ligand Size on the DNA Binding Properties, Cytotoxicity and Cellular Uptake of Organoruthenium(II) Complexes of the Type [(η6‐C6Me6)Ru(L)(pp)]n+ [L = Cl, n = 1; L = (NH2)2CS, n = 2]. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.200700206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.