Cited by 342Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Brain changes associated with cognitive and emotional factors in chronic pain: A systematic review

Open access
Malfliet, A., Coppieters, I., Van Wilgen, P., Kregel, J., De Pauw, R., Dolphens, M., Ickmans, K.·2017·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

An emerging technique in chronic pain research is MRI, which has led to the understanding that chronic pain patients display brain structure and function alterations. Many of these altered brain regions and networks are not just involved in pain processing, but also in other sensory and particularly cognitive tasks. Therefore, the next step is to investigate the relation between brain alterations and pain related cognitive and emotional factors. This review aims at providing an overview of the existing literature on this subject. Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for original research reports. Twenty eight eligible papers were included, with information on the association of brain alterations with pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Methodological quality of eligible papers was checked by two independent researchers. Evidence on the direction of these associations is inconclusive. Pain catastrophizing is related to brain areas involved in pain processing, attention to pain, emotion and motor activity, and to reduced top-down pain inhibition. In contrast to pain catastrophizing, evidence on anxiety and depressive symptoms shows no clear association with brain characteristics. However, all included cognitive or emotional factors showed significant associations with resting state fMRI data, providing that even at rest the brain reserves a certain activity for these pain-related factors. Brain changes associated with illness perceptions, pain attention, attitudes and beliefs seem to receive less attention in literature. SIGNIFICANCE: This review shows that maladaptive cognitive and emotional factors are associated with several brain regions involved in chronic pain. Targeting these factors in these patients might normalize specific brain alterations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alterations in gray matter morphology related to pain catastrophizing have been reported in patients with chronic pain, with associations in brain areas involved in pain processing, emotion and motor activity, attention to pain, and top-down inhibition of pain, but not in the BNST.

    “Alterations in GM morphology related to pain catastrophizing have been reported in patients with chronic pain, with associations found in brain areas involved in pain processing, emotion and motor activity, attention to pain, and top-down inhibition of pain, but not in BNST [59].”

    From The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis as a brain correlate of psychological inflexibility in fibromyalgia (2020) · cites this paper as [59]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 342

Authors
Malfliet, A., Coppieters, I., Van Wilgen, P., Kregel, J., De Pauw, R., Dolphens, M., & Ickmans, K.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA) Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy Vrije Universiteit Brussels Belgium
  • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University Belgium
Corresponding author
Malfliet, A.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
769-786
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2583178972
Cited by
342
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, brain changes, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety, depressive symptoms, resting-state brain activity, illness perception, cognitive and emotional factors, pain processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Brain, Cognition, Depression, Emotions, Fear, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review