Cited by 23Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Multisite musculoskeletal pain in adolescence as a predictor of medical and social welfare benefits in young adulthood: The Norwegian Arctic Adolescent Health Cohort Study

Open access
Eckhoff, C., Straume, B., Kvernmo, S.·2017·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain in adolescence is associated with mental health problems, the main reason for work disability in young adults. This study explores the relationship between multisite musculoskeletal pain in adolescence and later medical (sickness and medical rehabilitation benefits) and social welfare benefits, adjusted for sociodemographic, adolescent psychosocial and mental health problems. METHODS: Data were obtained by linkage between the National Insurance Registry (2003-11) and the Norwegian Arctic Adolescent Health Study, a school-based survey in North Norway (2003-05), accepted by 3987 fifteen- to sixteen-year-olds (68% of the total population). The start of the follow-up time was July 1st of the corresponding year the participants responded to the health study. Musculoskeletal pain was measured by the number of musculoskeletal pain sites. RESULTS: We found a positive linear relationship between adolescent musculoskeletal pain sites and the occurrence of medical and social welfare benefits in young adulthood (p ≤ 0.001). Adolescent musculoskeletal pain was a significant predictor of sickness (p < 0.001) and social welfare benefits in females (p = 0.036), when adjusted for adolescent psychosocial and mental health problems. The most important adolescent psychosocial predictors were externalizing problems, less parental involvement and adverse life events. CONCLUSION: Adolescent multisite musculoskeletal pain was found to be an important predictor of later sickness and social welfare benefit receipt from adolescence to young adulthood. SIGNIFICANCE: Adolescents with multisite musculoskeletal pain are at substantially increased risk of health and social difficulties into young adulthood. Identification and interventions for these adolescent problems could alleviate this risk and be a sound socioeconomic investment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1078

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical progression of hEDS is believed to unfold in three phases: the hypermobility phase, the pain phase, and the stiffness phase.

    “Limited data exist on gHSD prevalence and progression, but the clinical progression of hEDS is believed to unfold in three phases: the hypermobility phase, characterised by hypermobility and frequent joint sprains/strains; the pain phase, marked by widespread chronic pain; and the stiffness phase, with a notable decline in hypermobility. 43”

    From No association between joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal pain and neurodevelopmental problems in a school-based sample of 11-year-old children (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Methods (§2.5.1) measure adolescent musculoskeletal pain by body site, and the Discussion (§4) concerns its association with later benefits. Searches for hEDS, hypermobility, and the proposed hypermobility–pain–stiffness phases found no passage in our copy addressing that clinical progression. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) (2003). International Classification of Primary Care, Second edition (ICPC-2). http://www. who.int/classifications/icd/adaptations/icpc2/en/

Authors
Eckhoff, C., Straume, B., & Kvernmo, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Eckhoff, C.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-06
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1697-1706
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2725952486
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universitetet i Tromsø
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
adolescent pain, early adulthood, sickness benefits, welfare benefits, work disability, psychosocial problems, externalizing problems, parental involvement, life events, mental health, socioeconomic outcomes, longitudinal cohort
MeSH terms
Adolescent Health, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Norway, Registries, Social Welfare, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review