Efficacy, tolerability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management – An overview of systematic reviews
Abstract
Medicinal cannabis has already entered mainstream medicine in some countries. This systematic review (SR) aimed at evaluating the efficacy, acceptability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management. Qualitative systematic review of SRs of randomized controlled trials with cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management. The Cochrane databases of SR s, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and PubMed were searched for SR published in the period January 2009 to January 2017. Assessment of the methodological quality of SR was performed by the AMSTAR checklist. Out of 748 papers identified, 10 SR s met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was high in four and moderate in six SR s. There were inconsistent findings of four SR s on the efficacy of cannabis‐based medicines in neuropathic pain and of one SR for painful spasms in multiple sclerosis. There were consistent results that there was insufficient evidence of any cannabis‐based medicine for pain management in patients with rheumatic diseases (three SR s) and in cancer pain (two SR s). Cannabis‐based medicines undoubtedly enrich the possibilities of drug treatment of chronic pain conditions. It remains the responsibility of the health care community to continue to pursue rigorous study of cannabis‐based medicines to provide evidence that meets the standard of 21st century clinical care. Significance: We provide an overview of systematic reviews on the efficacy, tolerability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management. There are inconsistent findings of the efficacy of cannabinoids in neuropathic pain and painful spasms in multiple sclerosis. There are inconsistent results on tolerability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for any chronic pain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is insufficient evidence for cannabinoids for other types of chronic pain.
“Cannabinoids may alleviate neuropathic pain in some patients [82], but there is insufficient evidence for other types of chronic pain [83, 84].”
From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 175
- Authors
- Häuser, W., Petzke, F., & Fitzcharles, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Klinikum Saarbrücken (DE)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Häuser, W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 455-470
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2761349999
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- cannabis-based medicines, cannabinoids, chronic pain management, neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, rheumatic diseases, cancer pain, tolerability, drug safety, efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Cannabinoids, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuralgia, Rheumatic Diseases, Spasm, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists, Medical Marijuana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review