Cited by 175Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid Use

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management – An overview of systematic reviews

Häuser, W., Petzke, F., Fitzcharles, M.A.·2018·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Medicinal cannabis has already entered mainstream medicine in some countries. This systematic review (SR) aimed at evaluating the efficacy, acceptability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management. Qualitative systematic review of SRs of randomized controlled trials with cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management. The Cochrane databases of SR s, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and PubMed were searched for SR published in the period January 2009 to January 2017. Assessment of the methodological quality of SR was performed by the AMSTAR checklist. Out of 748 papers identified, 10 SR s met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was high in four and moderate in six SR s. There were inconsistent findings of four SR s on the efficacy of cannabis‐based medicines in neuropathic pain and of one SR for painful spasms in multiple sclerosis. There were consistent results that there was insufficient evidence of any cannabis‐based medicine for pain management in patients with rheumatic diseases (three SR s) and in cancer pain (two SR s). Cannabis‐based medicines undoubtedly enrich the possibilities of drug treatment of chronic pain conditions. It remains the responsibility of the health care community to continue to pursue rigorous study of cannabis‐based medicines to provide evidence that meets the standard of 21st century clinical care. Significance: We provide an overview of systematic reviews on the efficacy, tolerability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for chronic pain management. There are inconsistent findings of the efficacy of cannabinoids in neuropathic pain and painful spasms in multiple sclerosis. There are inconsistent results on tolerability and safety of cannabis‐based medicines for any chronic pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 175

Authors
Häuser, W., Petzke, F., & Fitzcharles, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Klinikum Saarbrücken (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Häuser, W.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-15
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
455-470
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2761349999
Cited by
175
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
cannabis-based medicines, cannabinoids, chronic pain management, neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, rheumatic diseases, cancer pain, tolerability, drug safety, efficacy
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Cannabinoids, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuralgia, Rheumatic Diseases, Spasm, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review