Role of personality and expectations for itch and scratching induced by audiovisual itch stimuli
Abstract
Itch is an unpleasant, bodily sensation, which--similar to pain--evokes behavioral reactions. As a response to itch, people start scratching. There are different ways to provoke itch and subsequent scratching in experimental settings. A non-invasive method to induce itch and scratching is the presentation of itch-related (audio-) visual stimulus material, like slide-supported lectures on skin diseases or crawling insects. Also, watching videos showing other people scratching provokes itch and the desire to scratch. In this review, we focus on psychological factors, which were shown to be associated with itch and scratching provoked by (audio-) visual itch stimuli. First, we summarize the findings on the relationship between personality characteristics and (audio-) visually induced itch. Agreeableness and self-consciousness were shown to be associated with induced itch and scratching in patients with chronic skin diseases, while neuroticism was linked to induced itch in healthy subjects. Second, we present results of a recent study, in which we altered the expectations towards audio-visually induced itch and scratching by changing the information given on upcoming itch stimuli. It was shown that subjects being informed about itch stimuli in a neutral way displayed a shorter scratch duration in itch inducing situations than subjects having catastrophizing expectations. Also, the increase in scratch duration and in the number of scratch movements induced by audiovisual itch stimuli was higher when the patients were not informed about itch induction. Thus, in itch patients neither catastrophizing nor trivializing symptoms seems to be helpful.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies using itch induction suggest that a focus on bodily sensations and catastrophizing of upcoming itch stimuli lead to greater itch intensity or more profound scratching behavior.
“Furthermore, studies using itch induction suggest that a focus on bodily sensations and catastrophizing of upcoming itch stimuli lead to greater itch intensity or more profound scratching behavior (28, 29).”
From Mindfulness as Predictor of Itch Catastrophizing in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: Results of a Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Schut, C., Rädel, A., Frey, L., Gieler, U., & Kupfer, J.
- Affiliations
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schut, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09-28
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-18
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2118323545
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- pruritus, scratching behavior, personality traits, agreeableness, neuroticism, self-consciousness, expectations, catastrophizing, chronic skin disease
- MeSH terms
- Auditory Perception, Humans, Personality, Pruritus, Visual Perception, Anticipation, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review