The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanation
Abstract
This paper examines three issues concerning the frequently documented negative correlation between formal education and ethnic prejudice, namely its reliability, its validity and the manner in which it is mediated. Reliability is demonstrated across three indices of ethnic attitudes in seven representative samples drawn from four European countries (West Germany, Netherlands, France, Great Britain; total N=3788). The hypothesis that this correlation reflects only the tendency of more highly educated respondents to give more socially desirable answers and not true attitude differences was inconsistent with the finding from the survey data that educational level also correlated negatively with responses to an index of subtle prejudice. Results from an experiment employing the bogus pipeline procedure similarly refute this hypothesis, indicating that significant education‐related differences in expressed prejudice remain under conditions in which the tendency to give socially desirable responses is reduced. Finally, path analysis based on the survey data show that part but not all of the association between low education and ethnic prejudice is mediated by social psychological variables, particularly group relative deprivation, perceived belief incongruency, political conservatism, and acceptance of inter‐ethnic contact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under conditions in which the tendency to give socially desirable answers is reduced, differences between educational groups may actually increase.
“This finding indicates that under conditions in which the tendency to give socially desirable answers is reduced, the differences between educational groups may actually increase.”
From The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison (2003) · cites this paper as Wagner and Zick, 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Wagner, U., & Zick, A.
- Affiliations
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- University of Wuppertal (DE)
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-56
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W1987793662
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- ethnic prejudice, ethnic attitudes, formal education, educational attainment, social desirability bias, subtle prejudice, political conservatism, interethnic contact, mediation, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review