The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: A systematic analysis
Abstract
A systematic analysis of protein staining in polyacrylamide gels with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) R‐250 and G‐250 using a high resolution densitometer allowing for quantitative measurements during staining and destaining has revealed that none of the published procedures allows quantitative measurements. Protein staining with CBB R‐250 in methanol/water/acetic acid is poor, as is staining with CBB G‐250 in trichloroacetic acid or perchloric acid, the latter two, however, allowing for a weak background staining. Consequently using the colloidal properties of the CBB dyes, stronger for G‐250 than for R‐250, it is possible to increase the sensitivity of protein staining to a detection limit of 0.7 ng bovine serum albumin/mm 2 gel. In addition, sensitive protein staining on a clear background is possible. Recipes are described (Section 3.11) for intensified protein staining with CBB G‐250 using trichloroacetic acid or perchloric acid on a clear background. Optimal staining of proteins on a clear background can be performed with phosphoric acid and CBB G‐250 in the presence of ammonium sulfate since under these conditions the colloidal state of the dye is optimized. Furthermore, conditions are described which allow the stable fixation of the protein‐dye complex. Combining the optimized staining conditions with the stable fixation in 20% ammonium sulfate allows for stepwise staining for e. g. detection of weak spots in addition to intense protein spots. The dependence of different staining procedures on gel thickness, gel concentration and compounds routinely used in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis is also analysed. Calibration curves and application of the new procedure to biological material demonstrate its wide applicability. Convincing arguments for the colloidal properties of the CBB dyes are presented, formulating the rationale for intensified protein staining with CBB dyes in polyacrylamide gels without background staining.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proteomic Approach to Identify Novel Mitochondrial Proteins in Arabidopsis
Kruft, V., Eubel, H., Jänsch, L., Werhahn, W., & Braun, H.-P. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.010474 · Cited by 371
Mouyna, I., Fontaine, T., Vai, M., Monod, M., Fonzi, W. A., Diaquin, M., Popolo, L., Hartland, R. P., & Latgé, J.-P. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.20.14882 · Cited by 353
Validation of protein carbonyl measurement: A multi-centre study
Augustyniak, E., Adam, A., Wojdyla, K., Rogowska-Wrzesinska, A., Willetts, R., Korkmaz, A., Atalay, M., Weber, D., Grune, T., Borsa, C., et al. (2015) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2014.12.014 · Cited by 135
Heinemann, B., Künzler, P., Eubel, H., Braun, H.-P., & Hildebrandt, T. M. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiaa050 · Cited by 87
Bras, G., Bochenska, O., Rapala-Kozik, M., Guevara-Lora, I., Faussner, A., Kamysz, W., & Kozik, A. (2013) · Peptides · doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2013.08.003 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R., & Eibl, H.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 427-448
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W1991498111
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: A systematic analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.1150060905
- The paper
- Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R., & Eibl, H. (1985). Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: A systematic analysis. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150060905
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.