Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 597

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: A systematic analysis

Neuhoff, Volker, Stamm, Reinhard, Eibl, Hansjörg·1985·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

A systematic analysis of protein staining in polyacrylamide gels with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) R‐250 and G‐250 using a high resolution densitometer allowing for quantitative measurements during staining and destaining has revealed that none of the published procedures allows quantitative measurements. Protein staining with CBB R‐250 in methanol/water/acetic acid is poor, as is staining with CBB G‐250 in trichloroacetic acid or perchloric acid, the latter two, however, allowing for a weak background staining. Consequently using the colloidal properties of the CBB dyes, stronger for G‐250 than for R‐250, it is possible to increase the sensitivity of protein staining to a detection limit of 0.7 ng bovine serum albumin/mm 2 gel. In addition, sensitive protein staining on a clear background is possible. Recipes are described (Section 3.11) for intensified protein staining with CBB G‐250 using trichloroacetic acid or perchloric acid on a clear background. Optimal staining of proteins on a clear background can be performed with phosphoric acid and CBB G‐250 in the presence of ammonium sulfate since under these conditions the colloidal state of the dye is optimized. Furthermore, conditions are described which allow the stable fixation of the protein‐dye complex. Combining the optimized staining conditions with the stable fixation in 20% ammonium sulfate allows for stepwise staining for e. g. detection of weak spots in addition to intense protein spots. The dependence of different staining procedures on gel thickness, gel concentration and compounds routinely used in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis is also analysed. Calibration curves and application of the new procedure to biological material demonstrate its wide applicability. Convincing arguments for the colloidal properties of the CBB dyes are presented, formulating the rationale for intensified protein staining with CBB dyes in polyacrylamide gels without background staining.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.1150060905

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 597

Metadata

Authors
Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R., & Eibl, H.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-01
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
427-448
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W1991498111
Cited by
597
References
0
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: A systematic analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.1150060905
The paper
Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R., & Eibl, H. (1985). Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: A systematic analysis. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150060905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.