The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein extraction for two‐dimensional electrophoresis from olive leaf, a plant tissue containing high levels of interfering compounds
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to establish a routine procedure for the application of proteomic analysis to olive tree. Olive leaf tissue is notoriously recalcitrant to common protein extraction methods due to high levels of interfering compounds. We developed a protocol for isolating proteins suitable for two‐dimensional electrophoresis (2‐DE) from olive leaf. The remarkable characteristics of the protocol include: (i) additional grinding dry acetone powder of leaf tissue to a finer extent, (ii) after extensive organic solvent washes to remove pigments, lipids etc., using aqueous tricholoroacetic acid washes to remove water‐soluble contaminants, and (iii) phenol extraction of proteins in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate. The final protein preparation is free of interfering compounds based on its well‐resolved 2‐DE patterns. The protocol can be completed within 3 h, and protein yield is approximately 2.49 mg⋅g−1 of aged leaf. We also evaluated the protocol by immunoblotting with anti‐tyrosinate α‐tubulin antibody. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a protocol for protein extraction from olive leaf appears to give satisfactory and reproducible results. The protocol is expected to be applicable to other recalcitrant plant tissues and could be of interest to laboratories involved in plant proteomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, W., Vignani, R., Scali, M., & Cresti, M. (2006) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200500722 · Cited by 543
Self-citationIn Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Methods for samples preparation in proteomic research
Bodzon-Kulakowska, A., Bierczynska-Krzysik, A., Dylag, T., Drabik, A., Suder, P., Noga, M., Jarzebinska, J., & Silberring, J. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.040 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Scali, M., Vignani, R., Spadafora, A., Sensi, E., Mazzuca, S., & Cresti, M.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2369-2375
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W1973114737
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein extraction for two‐dimensional electrophoresis from olive leaf, a plant tissue containing high levels of interfering compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.200305500
- The paper
- Wang, W., Scali, M., Vignani, R., Spadafora, A., Sensi, E., Mazzuca, S., & Cresti, M. (2003). Protein extraction for two‐dimensional electrophoresis from olive leaf, a plant tissue containing high levels of interfering compounds. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.