Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An investigation into the human serum “interactome”

Zhou, Ming, Lucas, David A., Chan, King C., Issaq, Haleem J., Petricoin, Emanuel F., Liotta, Lance A., Veenstra, Timothy D., Conrads, Thomas P.·2004·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

The protein content of human serum is composed of a millieu of proteins from almost every type of cell and tissue within the body. The serum proteome has been shown to contain information that directly reflects pathophysiological states and represents an invaluable source of diagnostic information for a variety of different diseases. Unfortunately, the dynamic range of protein abundance, ranging from ≫ mg/mL level to ≪ pg/mL level, renders complete characterization of this proteome nearly impossible with current analytical methods. To study low‐abundance proteins, which have potential value for clinical diagnosis, the high‐abundant species, such as immunoglobulins and albumin, are generally eliminated as the first step in many analytical protocols. This step, however, is hypothesized to concomitantly remove proteins/peptides associated with the high‐abundant proteins targeted for depletion. In this study, immunoprecipitation was combined with microcapillary reversed‐phase liquid chromatography (μRPLC) coupled on‐line with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to investigate the low‐molecular‐weight proteins/peptides that associate with the most abundant species in serum. By this targeted isolation of select highly abundant serum proteins, the associated proteins/peptides can be enriched and effectively identified by μRPLC‐MS/MS. Among the 210 proteins identified, 73% and 67% were not found in previous studies of the low‐molecular‐weight or whole‐serum proteome, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.200405866

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, M., Lucas, D. A., Chan, K. C., Issaq, H. J., Petricoin, E. F., Liotta, L. A., Veenstra, T. D., & Conrads, T. P.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1289-1298
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W1992730111
Cited by
313
References
3
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An investigation into the human serum “interactome”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.200405866
The paper
Zhou, M., Lucas, D. A., Chan, K. C., Issaq, H. J., Petricoin, E. F., Liotta, L. A., Veenstra, T. D., & Conrads, T. P. (2004). An investigation into the human serum “interactome”. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200405866

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.