The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Membrane proteins and proteomics: Love is possible, but so difficult
Open accessAbstract
Despite decades of extensive research, the large‐scale analysis of membrane proteins remains a difficult task. This is due to the fact that membrane proteins require a carefully balanced hydrophilic and lipophilic environment, which optimum varies with different proteins, while most protein chemistry methods work mainly, if not only, in water‐based media. Taking this review [Santoni, Molloy and Rabilloud, Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible? Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1054–1070] as a pivotal paper, the current paper analyzes how the field of membrane proteomics exacerbated the trend in proteomics, i.e. developing alternate methods to the historical two‐dimensional electrophoresis, and thus putting more and more pressure on the mass spectrometry side. However, in the case of membrane proteins, the incentive in doing so is due to the poor solubility of membrane proteins. This review also shows that in some situations, where this solubility problem is less acute, two‐dimensional electrophoresis remains a method of choice. Last but not least, this review also critically examines the alternate approaches that have been used for the proteomic analysis of membrane proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioinspired polymer vesicles and membranes for biological and medical applications
Palivan, C. G., Goers, R., Najer, A., Zhang, X., Car, A., & Meier, W. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00569h · Cited by 584
Popot, J.-L. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052208.114057 · Cited by 288
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: A tutorial
Rabilloud, T., & Lelong, C. (2011) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.040 · Cited by 258
Self-citationEmerging affinity-based techniques in proteomics
Xie, S., Moya, C., Bilgin, B., Jayaraman, A., & Walton, S. P. (2009) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1586/epr.09.74 · Cited by 38
Antigenicity of Bovine Pericardium Determined by a Novel Immunoproteomic Approach
Gates, K. V., Dalgliesh, A. J., & Griffiths, L. G. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02719-8 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Rabilloud, T.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S174-80
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2139938595
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane proteins and proteomics: Love is possible, but so difficult. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.200900050
- The paper
- Rabilloud, T. (2009). Membrane proteins and proteomics: Love is possible, but so difficult. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.