Cited by 64Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureGenomics and Rare Diseases

ISO 17025 validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for relationship testing

Buchard, Anders, Kampmann, Marie‐Louise, Poulsen, Lena, Børsting, Claus, Morling, Niels·2016·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

The HID‐Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel is a next‐generation sequencing assay with 90 autosomal and 34 Y‐chromosome SNPs that are amplified in one PCR step and subsequently sequenced using the Ion Personal Genome Machine (Ion PGM™) System. This assay was validated for relationship testing in our ISO 17025 accredited laboratory in 2015. Here, the essential parts of the validation report submitted to the Danish Accreditation Fund are presented. A total of 100 unrelated Danes were typed in duplicates and the locus balance, heterozygote balance (Hb) and noise levels were analysed in detail. Two loci were disregarded for casework because genotyping was uncertain. Hb for rs7520386 was skewed and high levels of noise were observed in rs576261. Three general acceptance criteria for analysis of single‐source samples were defined: (i) sequencing depth > 200 reads, (ii) noise level < 3% and (iii) Hb > 0.3. A Python script named SNPonPGM was developed to assist the analyst by highlighting loci that do not fulfil the general acceptance criteria. Furthermore, SNPonPGM has functions that reduce the hands‐on time of the reporting officer to a few minutes per case. Mixtures with DNA from two individuals in a 1:24 ratio were readily identified using the three criteria and the SNPonPGM script.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.201600269

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laboratories seeking accreditation under CLIA or ISO 17025 must conduct positive and negative controls with every batch, document lot numbers, and participate in external proficiency testing.

    “Laboratories seeking accreditation under CLIA or ISO 17025 [46] must conduct positive and negative controls with every batch, document lot numbers, and participate in external proficiency testing.”
  • Introducing such test systems must be critically validated under CLIA or ISO 17025 guidelines before becoming part of forensic assays.

    “Moreover, introducing such test systems must be critically validated under these guidelines before becoming part of forensic assays [46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Buchard, A., Kampmann, M., Poulsen, L., Børsting, C., & Morling, N.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Buchard, Anders
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10
Volume
37
Issue
21
Pages
2822-2831
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2530226004
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electrophoresis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
Y-chromosome SNPs, autosomal SNPs, sequencing noise, DNA mixture analysis, forensic genetics
MeSH terms
Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Forensic Genetics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review