Cited by 7Virus-based gene therapy researchMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Size distribution analysis of residual host cell DNA fragments in lentivirus by CGE-LIF

Wang, Wentao, Gao, Tie, Luo, Ji, Guo, Lihai, Li, Xiang, Li, Yan, Chen, Hongxu·2023·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

During the production of cell and gene therapy products, residual host cell DNA (HCD) could cause safety risks of the biological products, and the longer the residual HCD fragment, the greater the risk to the human body. For this reason, it was necessary to develop an effective method for the size distribution analysis of residual HCD fragments with high accuracy and sensitivity. In this study, capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detector (CGE-LIF) was used to analyze the size distribution of residual HCD fragments in lentivirus products. The results confirmed that lentiviral RNA genome could interfere with the size distribution analysis of residual HCD fragments. By optimizing the amount of RNase I and digestion time in sample pretreatment process, the interfere of RNA genome could be avoided. The specificity, precision, accuracy, linear range, the detection of limit (LOD), and the quantification of limit (LOQ) of CGE-LIF method were also validated. The results showed that the CGE-LIF method had a good performance both in terms of specificity and reproducibility. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations of migration time and corrected peak area were all less than 1% and 2%, respectively. The 200 bp DNA marker had a good linearity between 50 and 1000 pg/ml. The LOD and LOQ of 200 bp DNA marker were 2.59 and 8.64 pg/ml, respectively. In addition, this method was successfully used to analyze the size distribution analysis of residual HCD f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.202200218

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W., Gao, T., Luo, J., Guo, L., Li, X., Li, Y., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
  • SCIEX Beijing P. R. China
  • National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
  • National Medical Products Administration (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Xiang
  • Li, Yan
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-21
Volume
44
Issue
3-4
Pages
462-471
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W4308679411
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electrophoresis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
lentivirus, cell and gene therapy products, product safety, method validation
MeSH terms
DNA, Genetic Markers, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Lentivirus, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Electrophoresis, Capillary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review