The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fate of Pesticides in the Environment and its Bioremediation
Abstract
The present paper is an overview of the presence and fate of pesticides as persistent organic pollutants in the environment as well as of the potential for their detoxification, also combined with chemical and physical treatment. It contains information gathered from a range of currently available sources. The fate of pesticides in the environment is analyzed considering the processes that determine their persistence and mobility, grouped into transport, transfer and transformation processes. Few pesticide characteristics such as persistence, mobility and biodegradability are emphasized. The fate of a pesticide and the potential for its persistence and mobility from the site of application are considered to be affected by the chemical and physical properties of the pesticide, site characteristics such as soil and groundwater individuality, climate and local weather conditions, biological population, and the handling practices of the pesticide user. Bioremediation, as one of the most environmentally‐sound and cost‐effective methods for the decontamination and detoxification of a pesticide‐contaminated environment is discussed especially considering the factors affecting the biodegradability of pesticides such as biological factors and the characteristics of the chemical compounds. In situ and ex situ bioremediation as possible types of bioremediation activities are weighted up. Also, the paper includes some considerations for developing strategies regarding the choice of bioremediation technology, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the bioremediation of environmental components polluted with pesticides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gavrilescu, M., Demnerová, K., Aamand, J., Agathos, S., & Fava, F. (2015) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2014.01.001 · Cited by 1,266
Self-citationOccurrence, impacts and general aspects of pesticides in surface water: A review
de Souza, R. M., Seibert, D., Quesada, H. B., de Jesus Bassetti, F., Fagundes-Klen, M. R., & Bergamasco, R. (2020) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2019.12.035 · Cited by 607
Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium
Gavrilescu, M., Pavel, L. V., & Cretescu, I. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.103 · Cited by 577
Self-citationRecent advances in carbon nanomaterial-based adsorbents for water purification
Gusain, R., Kumar, N., & Ray, S. S. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213111 · Cited by 566
Advanced technologies for the remediation of pesticide-contaminated soils
Morillo, E., & Villaverde, J. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.020 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavrilescu, M.
- Venue
- Engineering in Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 497-526
- ISSN
- 1618-0240 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2863
- OpenAlex
- W2051769381
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fate of Pesticides in the Environment and its Bioremediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elsc.200520098
- The paper
- Gavrilescu, M. (2005). Fate of Pesticides in the Environment and its Bioremediation. Engineering in Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200520098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.