The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbial Fuel Cells in Relation to Conventional Anaerobic Digestion Technology
Abstract
Conventional anaerobic digestion based bioconversion processes produce biogas and have as such been widely applied for the production of renewable energy so far. An innovative technology, based on the use of microbial fuel cells, is considered as a new pathway for bioconversion processes towards electricity. In comparison with conventional anaerobic digestion, the microbial fuel cell technology holds some specific advantages, such as its applicability for the treatment of low concentration substrates at temperatures below 20 °C, where anaerobic digestion generally fails to function. This provides some specific application niches of the microbial fuel cell technology where it does not compete with but complements the anaerobic digestion technology. However, microbial fuel cells still face important limitations in terms of large‐scale application. The limitations involve the investment costs, upscale technical issues and the factors limiting the performance, both in terms of anodic and cathodic electron transfer. Research to render the microbial fuel cell technology more economically feasible and applicable should focus on reactor configuration, power density and the material costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview
Rismani-Yazdi, H., Carver, S. M., Christy, A. D., & Tuovinen, O. H. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.074 · Cited by 734
Advances in Microbial Fuel Cells for Wastewater Treatment
He, L., Du, P., Chen, Y., Lu, H., Cheng, X., Chang, B., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.069 · Cited by 408
Increasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cells
Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.104 · Cited by 331
Life cycle assessment of microalgae-assisted microbial fuel cells
Akinbuja, O., Orta, S. V., & Boodhoo, K. (2025) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-025-02518-8 · Cited by 18
Industrial Scale-Up Variability and Life Cycle Assessment of Microbial Fuel Cells
Mittal, H. (2024) · doi:10.32388/4ynyhr · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Pham, T. H., Rabaey, K., Aelterman, P., Clauwaert, P., De Schamphelaire, L., Boon, N., & Verstraete, W.
- Venue
- Engineering in Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-292
- ISSN
- 1618-0240 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2863
- OpenAlex
- W2013092969
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial Fuel Cells in Relation to Conventional Anaerobic Digestion Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elsc.200620121
- The paper
- Pham, T. H., Rabaey, K., Aelterman, P., Clauwaert, P., De Schamphelaire, L., Boon, N., & Verstraete, W. (2006). Microbial Fuel Cells in Relation to Conventional Anaerobic Digestion Technology. Engineering in Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200620121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.